Table 3.
Association Between Sensory Impairment and Frailty According to Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses
| Prefrail vs Robust | Frail vs Robust | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
| Model 1 | No sensory impairment | Reference | Reference | ||
| Hearing impairment only | 1.26 (0.97–1.64) | 0.09 | 1.19 (0.63–2.27) | 0.59 | |
| Visual impairment only | 1.43 (1.22–1.69) | <0.001 | 1.79 (1.23–2.61) | 0.003 | |
| Dual sensory impairment | 2.19 (1.83–2.62) | <0.001 | 3.94 (2.74–5.68) | <0.001 | |
| Model 2 | No sensory impairment | Reference | Reference | ||
| Hearing impairment only | 1.16 (0.88–1.52) | 0.309 | 1.03 (0.53–2.03) | 0.924 | |
| Visual impairment only | 1.38 (1.16–1.64) | <0.001 | 1.42 (0.96–2.11) | 0.082 | |
| Dual sensory impairment | 1.94 (1.59–2.36) | <0.001 | 2.74 (1.83–4.10) | <0.001 | |
| Model 3 | No sensory impairment | Reference | Reference | ||
| Hearing impairment only | 1.13 (0.86–1.50) | 0.376 | 0.99 (0.50–1.97) | 0.981 | |
| Visual impairment only | 1.39 (1.17–1.65) | <0.001 | 1.51 (1.01–2.25) | 0.046 | |
| Dual sensory impairment | 1.89 (1.55–2.31) | <0.001 | 2.45 (1.62–3.69) | <0.001 | |
| Model 4 | No sensory impairment | Reference | Reference | ||
| Hearing impairment only | 1.07 (0.80–1.42) | 0.664 | 0.82 (0.40–1.68) | 0.583 | |
| Visual impairment only | 1.41 (1.18–1.68) | <0.001 | 1.54 (1.00–2.36) | 0.048 | |
| Dual sensory impairment | 1.81 (1.47–2.21) | <0.001 | 2.17 (1.40–3.38) | 0.001 | |
Notes: Model 1 unadjusted; Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, education, ethnicity and marital status; Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, education, ethnicity, marital status, smoker, alcohol abuse, number of chronic diseases, and cognitive impairment; Model 4 adjusted for age, sex, education, ethnicity, marital status, smoker, alcohol abuse, number of chronic diseases, cognitive impairment, depression, ADL impairment, sleep condition and malnutrition status.
Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.