Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;9(67):39011–39024. doi: 10.1039/c9ra08072d

Comparison of various reported studies for the chemical flocculation-based harvesting of microalgal biomass with the present study.

Microalgal species Flocculation type Flocculant used (grade) Harvesting efficiency (%) Volume of culture Cost of harvesting kg of biomass−1 (USD) References
Chlorella sp. FC2 Chemical FeSO4 (commercial) 87.48 20 L 0.17–0.3 Present study
Chlorella sp. FC2 Chemical FeSO4 (commercial) 94.33 5 L 0.16–0.28 Present study
Chlorella sp. FC2 Chemical FeSO4 (commercial) 95.36 350 mL 0.16–0.27 Present study
Chlorella sp. FC2 Chemical FeSO4 (commercial) 99.09 40 mL 0.15–0.26 Present study
Chlorella sp. FC2 Chemical FeSO4 (analytical) 92.3 20 L 18.33 Present study
Chlorella vulgaris Chemical Nano-aminoclays (analytical) 99 1 L Farooq et al.34
Chlorella sorokiniana Chemical Chitosan (analytical) 99 50 mL 0.2 Xu et al.35
Chlorella minutissima Chemical Fe2(SO4)3 (analytical) 80 20 mL Papazi et al.36
Phaeodactylum tricornutum Chemical Polyaluminium chloride (analytical) 67 2 L 0.386 Şirin et al.37
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chemical Polyaluminium chloride (commercial) 96.7 500 mL 0.077 Delrue et al.18
Chlorella vulgaris Chemical Tanfloc SL (commercial) 95 100 mL NA Roselet et al.19
Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus obliquus Chemical Ferric chloride (analytical) 79–80 1 L 1.6–2.2 Koley et al.38