Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;2022:3742208. doi: 10.1155/2022/3742208

Table 9.

Anti-inflammatory activity of components from A. pilosa.

A. pilosa extract Experimental model Test dose range Contrast Route of administration Pharmacological action Mechanism of action References
Agrimonolide LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 μg/ml Negative control NS Anti-inflammatory NO scavenging, COX-2/inos↓, NF-κB ↓, MAPKs↓, JAK-STATs↓ [35]
Agrimonolide-6-O-β-D-glucopyranoside LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells 50, 100, 200 μg/ml 4-Ethyl-2-hydroxyamino-5-nitro-3-hexenamide (200 μM) NS NO scavenging NS [47]
Agrimonolide-6-O-β-D-glucopyranoside LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells 25, 50, 100 μg/ml Negative control NS NO production decreasing NS [35]
Pilosanol N LPS/IFN-γ-induced RAW264.7 macrophages 25, 50, 100 μg/ml NOR3 (200 μM) NS NO scavenging May contribute to the catechol group (3′, 4′-OH) of the B ring in the structure [67]
Pilosanol N LPS/IFN-γ-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages 25, 50, 100 μg/ml IFN-γ and l-arginine NS NO production decreasing iNOS↑and may also contribute to NF-κB/NO signaling disrupting [67]