Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 29;2022:3837471. doi: 10.1155/2022/3837471

Table 2.

Base case analysis–results–costs per patient and cost-utility analysis (€2020).

Items STN1013001 (%) Latanoprost (%) Difference (%) [95% CI]a,b
French health system viewpoint
Cost
Diagnosis €191.60 (8.16) €192.75 (8.24) −€1.15 (14.63) [−€32.62; €30.80]
Medications €341.28 (14.54) €241.81 (10.33) €99.47 (−1070.48) [€95.04; €104.53]
Add-on therapies and follow-up €1337.59 (56.97) €1339.40 (57.23) −€1.81 (22.14) [−€146.76; €143.26]
OSD management €477.27 (20.33) €566.38 (24.20) −€89.11 (1133.72) [−€160.16; −€19.73]
Overall €2347.74 (100.00) €2340.34 (100.00) €7.39 (100) [€159.39; €166.60]

LYS and QALYs
LYS 4.228 4.223 0.005 [−0.013; 0.023]
QALYs 2.539 2.191 0.348 [0.285; 0.408]

Cost-utility analysis
Incremental costs (ΔC) €7.39
Incremental QALYs (ΔQALYs) 0.348
ICUR (ΔC/ΔQALYs) €21.26

a(STN1013001–Latanoprost). b95% CI was calculated via the percentile method [34]. CI = confidence interval; ICUR = incremental cost-utility ratio; LYS = life year saved; OAG/OHT = open-angle glaucoma/ocular hypertension; OSD = ocular surface disease; and QALYs = quality-adjusted life years. Bold fonts were used to highlight some results.