Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 13;9(71):41383–41391. doi: 10.1039/c9ra08726e

Performance comparison of different methods for detection of p-NA.

Methods Linear range Detection limit Real sample Ref.
Triphenylamine-functionalized luminescent sensor 0–122.0 μM 72.0 nM 37
Glassy carbon electrode 0.01–7.0 μM 8.0 nM Lake water 38
Fluorescence probe-based nitrogen-doped carbon dots 0–50.0 mM 1.0 μM Lake water, soil 39
MIPIL microspheres 10.0 nM to 10.0 M 9.0 nM Waste water 40
GQDs@MIP 0–15.0 μM 7.0 nM Tap water, lake water, fish This work