Table 3.
MPT model analysis results of Experiment 1
Model | Restriction | Goodness-of-fit test results | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low-saliency | Moderate-saliency | High-saliency | ||||||||
G2(1) | p | ω | G2(1) | p | ω | G2(1) | p | ω | ||
Baseline | prrIR1 = prrC1 | 13.39 | <.001 | .05 | 31.68 | <.001 | .08 | 25.15 | <.001 | .07 |
prrIR2 = prrC2 | 13.70 | <.001 | .05 | 9.10 | <.01 | .04 | 6.84 | <.01 | .04 | |
prrC1 = prrC2 | 1.38 | .24 | .01 | 0.50 | .48 | .01 | 2.56 | .11 | .02 | |
Reparametrized | prrIR1 − prrC1 = prrIR2 − prrC2 | 0.67 | .41 | .01 | 5.63 | .02 | .02 | 12.56 | <.001 | .04 |
Note. In the restriction equation of each model, 1 means context repetition, 2 means context change