Table 5.
Experiment | Model | Restriction | Goodness-of-fit test results | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate saliency | High saliency | |||||||
G2(1) | p | ω | G2(1) | p | ω | |||
Experiment 2A | Baseline | prrIR1 = prrC1 | 4.53 | .03 | .03 | 4.40 | .04 | .03 |
prrIR2 = prrC2 | 0.77 | .38 | .01 | 6.25 | .01 | .04 | ||
prrC1 = prrC2 | 0.64 | .42 | .01 | 5.86 | .02 | .03 | ||
Reparametrized | prrIR1 − prrC1 = prrIR2 − prrC2 | 7.82 | <.01 | .03 | 0.37 | .54 | .01 | |
Experiment 2B | Baseline | prrIR1 = prrC1 | 5.29 | .02 | .04 | 4.49 | .03 | .03 |
prrIR2 = prrC2 | 1.80 | .18 | .02 | 5.03 | .02 | .03 | ||
prrC1 = prrC2 | 0.51 | .47 | .01 | 4.04 | .04 | .02 | ||
Reparametrized | prrIR1 − prrC1 = prrIR2 − prrC2 | 4.66 | .03 | .02 | 0.18 | .67 | <.01 |
Note. In the restriction equation of each model, 1 means context repetition, 2 means context change.