Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;84(4):1264–1285. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02428-5

Table 5.

MPT model analysis results of Experiments 2A and 2B

Experiment Model Restriction Goodness-of-fit test results
Moderate saliency High saliency
G2(1) p ω G2(1) p ω
Experiment 2A Baseline prrIR1 = prrC1 4.53 .03 .03 4.40 .04 .03
prrIR2 = prrC2 0.77 .38 .01 6.25 .01 .04
prrC1 = prrC2 0.64 .42 .01 5.86 .02 .03
Reparametrized prrIR1prrC1 = prrIR2prrC2 7.82 <.01 .03 0.37 .54 .01
Experiment 2B Baseline prrIR1 = prrC1 5.29 .02 .04 4.49 .03 .03
prrIR2 = prrC2 1.80 .18 .02 5.03 .02 .03
prrC1 = prrC2 0.51 .47 .01 4.04 .04 .02
Reparametrized prrIR1prrC1 = prrIR2prrC2 4.66 .03 .02 0.18 .67 <.01

Note. In the restriction equation of each model, 1 means context repetition, 2 means context change.