Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 20;13(5):953–967. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01240-0

Table 3.

Linear regression analyses for the association between laboratory HbA1c, POCT-HbA1c, and estimated HbA1c (30 days), and estimated HbA1c (90 days) in conventional SMBG users

Model HbA1c parameter R R2 Adj R2 Standardize β B (95% CI) p value
Unadjusted eAG-30 0.83 0.689 0.69 0.83 0.97 (0.79–1.16) < 0.001
eAG-90 0.81 0.656 0.65 0.81 0.99 (0.79–1.21) < 0.001
POCT-HbA1c 0.83 0.689 0.72 0.85 0.94 (0.77–1.11) < 0.001
Adjusted Module 1 eAG-30 0.84 0.706 0.68 0.83 0.98 (0.76–1.17) < 0.001
eAG-90 0.81 0.656 0.64 0.81 0.99 (0.78–1.19) < 0.001
POCT-HbA1c 0.86 0.740 0.72 0.86 0.95 (0.77–1.12) < 0.001
Adjusted Module 2 eAG-30 0.84 0.706 0.67 0.98 0.98 (0.78–1.17) < 0.001
eAG-90 0.81 0.656 0.63 0.81 0.99 (0.77–1.20) < 0.001
POCT-HbA1c 0.87 0.757 0.73 0.87 0.96 (0.79–1.13) < 0.001

Dependent variable is laboratory HbA1c, and independent variables are eAG-30, eAG-90, and POCT- HbA1c

Module 1 was adjusted for age and gender, and module 2 was adjusted for all variables in Model 1 plus duration of DM, type of diabetes, and treatment