Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 9;8(4):2138–2147. doi: 10.1039/c7ra09097h

Comparison of glucose sensor analytical performances between GCE/TiO2 NW/PAPBA–Au TNC, PAPBA–Au NC electrodes fabricated in this work and other glucose sensors.

Glucose sensor Sensitivity [μA cm−2 mM−1] Linear range [mM] Reference
GOx/PANI-NF/GCE 0.01–1.0 44
Cyt c/AuNPs/PANI-NS 63.1 0.01–3.2 45
PANI-NT/GOx 4.62 0.01–5.5 46
GOx/n-TiO2/PANI/GCE 6.31 0.02–6.0 47
Pt/CNTs/TiO2 NTAs 0.24 0.006–1.5 48
GOx/TiO2/CNTs 11.3 ± 1.3 Up to 3.0 49
TiO2–SWCNT NWS 5.32 0.010–1.42 50
Cu2O/TiO2 14.56 3.0–9.0 51
GOx/Ag/TiO2 NTAs 0.39 0.1–4.0 52
GOx/Pt/Gr/TiO2 NTAs 0.94 0.1–8.0 53
AuNPs–TiO2 NT 0.40–8.0 54
TiO2–GR 6.20 0–8.0 21
Chitosan–AuNPs 0.006–0.14 55
GOD/1DH S–TiO2 9.9 0.2–1.0 56
GOD/HNF–TiO2/GC 32.6 0.002–3.17 57
Nafion-silica/MWCNTs-g-PANI/GOx 5.01 1–10 58
GCE/PAPBA–Au NC 34.6 0.5–11.0 This work
GCE/TiO2 NW/PAPBA–Au TNC 66.8 0.5–11.0 This work