Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;48(3):575–589. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac004

Table 2.

IQ and Educational Attainment Across Group as a Function of Childhood Maltreatment Exposurea

Maltreatment Exposure Unexposed M (SD) Exposed M (SD) t (df) P
IQ
Controls (N = 1283)
Childhood maltreatment (1042 vs 241) 103.96 (17.44) 98.69 (17.86) 4.21 (1281) <.001
Abuse (1055 vs 228) 104.05 (17.65) 98.01 (16.72) 4.73 (1281) <.001
Neglect (1036 vs 247) 103.97 (17.29) 98.80 (18.49) 4.17 (1281) <.001
FEP patients (N = 829)
Childhood maltreatment (465 vs 364) 86.34 (18.47) 83.37 (17.69) 2.35 (827) .019
Abuse (492 vs 337) 85.33 (18.32) 84.61 (17.99) 0.56 (827) .578
Neglect (468 vs 361) 86.21 (18.54) 83.52 (17.62) 2.11 (827) .035
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Controls (N = 1283)
Childhood maltreatment (1042 vs 241) 3.93 (1.42) 3.59 (1.42) 3.38 (1281) .001
Abuse (1055 vs 228) 3.92 (1.42) 3.64 (1.45) 2.66 (1281) .008
Neglect (1036 vs 247) 3.95 (1.41) 3.52 (1.42) 4.32 (1281) <.001
FEP patients (N = 829)
Childhood maltreatment (465 vs 364) 3.12 (1.41) 2.80 (1.37) 3.25 (827) .001
Abuse (492 vs 337) 3.08 (1.38) 2.82 (1.42) 2.60 (827) .010
Neglect (468 vs 361) 3.13 (1.45) 2.78 (1.35) 3.61 (827) <.001

Note: df, degrees of freedom; FEP, first-episode psychosis; IQ, intelligence quotient; M, Mean; SD, Standard Deviation.

aDefined as mean Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score > 80th percentile of the control group.