Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;22:510. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09616-y

Table 2.

The sensitivity of DMRTA2 by different types of disease in urine samples

Discovery seta Validation seta Aggregate set
Type of disease Samples DMRTA2-positive Sensitivity (95%CI) Samples DMRTA2-positive Sensitivity (95%CI) Samples DMRTA2-positive Sensitivity (95%CI)
Bladder cancer 137 117 85.4% (78.1–90.6%) 79 62 78.5% (67.5–86.6%) 216 179 82.9% (77.0–87.5%)
Carcinomas of renal pelvis 23 18 78.3% (55.8–91.7%) 12 11 91.7% (59.8–99.6%) 35 29 82.9% (65.7–92.8%)
Carcinomas of ureter 13 7 53.8% (26.1–79.6%) 6 3 50.0% (13.9–86.1%) 19 10 52.6% (29.5–74.8%)
Renal carcinomas 31 0 0 40 2 5.0% (0.8–18.2%) 71 2 2.8% (0.5–10.7%)
Prostate cancers 13 1 7.7% (0.4–37.9%) 49 5 10.2% (3.8–23.0%) 62 6 9.7% (4–20.5%)
Benign tumors of bladder 28 3 10.7% (2.8–29.4%) 22 7 31.8% (14.7–54.9%) 50 10 20.0% (10.5–34.1%)
Recurring cancers 22 17 77.3% (54.2–91.3%) 8 7 87.5% (46.7–99.3%) 30 24 80.0% (60.8–91.6%)
Specificity Specificity Specificity
Normalb 202 14 93.1%b (88.4–96.0%) 304 24 92.1%b (88.3–94.8%) 506 38 92.5%b (89.7–94.6%)

aCutoff CT-value of 37 was used for both discovery and validation set

bNormal controls were not healthy donors but subjects with benign diseases of the urinary tract