Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;22:168. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02104-6

Table 2.

Adjusted association of oral health indicators and confounders with poor OHRQoL by OHIP-14K (n = 675)

Variables N Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
OR (95% confidence interval)
Dental status
Dentate 407 1
Denture 268 1.25 (0.89–1.76)
TOF, Newton
 ≥ 330 293 1
 < 330 382 1.47 (1.06–2.04)
NTR
 ≥ 25 518 1
 ≤ 24 157 2.26 (1.54–3.31)
NT
 ≥ 15 431 1
 ≤ 14 244 1.45 (1.02–2.07)
Age 675 1.00 (0.96–1.02) 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.99 (0.96–1.02)
Gender
Men 219 1 1 1 1
Women 456 1.48 (0.93–2.35) 1.47 (0.92–2.34) 1.58 (0.99–2.53) 1.50 (0.95–2.39)
Education level
Middle school or less 512 1 1 1 1
High school or more 152 0.71 (0.48–1.07) 0.72 (0.48–1.07) 0.71 (0.47–1.07) 0.73 (0.48–1.09)
Not informed 11 2.32 (0.66–8.24) 2.25 (0.63–8.01) 2.78 (0.78–9.91) 2.20 (0.62–7.83)
Alcohol
No 219 1 1 1 1
Yes 438 0.72 (0.51–1.02) 0.72 (0.51–1.02) 0.72 (0.51–1.03) 0.73 (0.52–1.04)
Not informed 18 1.55 (0.50–4.85) 1.57 (0.50–4.92) 1.74 (0.55–5.50) 1.47 (0.47–0.64)
Smoking*
No 443 1 1 1 1
Yes 202 1.20 (0.75–1.93) 1.24 (0.78–1.99) 1.17 (0.73–1.88) 1.15 (0.71–1.86)
Not informed 30 1.29 (0.52–3.19) 1.31 (0.53–3.26) 1.44 (0.58–3.57) 1.32 (0.53–3.27)
Periodontitis
No 123 1 1 1 1
Yes 490 1.46 (0.95–2.27) 1.51 (0.96–2.38) 1.41 (0.91–2.18) 1.40 (0.90–2.18)
Not informed 62 1.19 (0.62–2.30) 1.17 (0.61–2.26) 1.29 (0.67–2.49) 1.14 (0.59–2.19)
Metabolic syndrome
No 294 1 1 1 1
Yes 381 0.76 (0.55–1.05) 0.76 (0.55–1.05) 0.69 (0.50–0.96) 0.76 (0.55–1.05)
Frailty
No 541 1 1 1 1
Yes 109 1.71 (1.11–2.64) 1.67 (1.09–2.57) 1.63 (1.06–2.53) 1.71 (1.11–2.63)
Not informed 25 1.04 (0.45–2.38) 1.09 (0.47–2.52) 1.06 (0.46–2.45) 1.05 (0.46–2.41)

OHRQoL: Fair denotes OHIP-14K < 3: never, hardly ever, occasionally; Poor denotes OHIP-14K ≥ 3: fairly often, very often

TOF, total occlusion force; NRT, number of total natural and rehabilitated; NT, number of remaining natural teeth

Bold denotes statistical significance at p < 0.05

Odd ratio: obtained by multivariable logistic regression adjusted for all variables in each model

Periodontitis: followed by guideline “Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition” [51] classified into two groups: No (healthy or stage I–II) and Yes (stage III–IV)

*Smoking: No denotes never smoked; Yes denotes past and current smoker

Alcohol drinking: “No” denotes “never drunken”; “Yes” denotes “past and current drinker”

Metabolic syndrome: No denotes two or fewer factors, Yes denotes three or more factors among five factors: obesity (body mass index (body kg/ height m2) ≥ 25); Total triglyceride ≥ 150 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol: Male < 40 mg/dL, Female < 50 mg/dL or medication for dyslipidemia; Hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 85 mmHg or medication for hypertension; Glycated hemoglobin ≥ 5.3% or medication for diabetes

Model 1: model of dental status, − 2 Log likelihood = 885.978, Cox&Snell R square = 0.052

Model 2: model of total occlusion force, − 2 Log likelihood = 882.296, Cox&Snell R square = 0.058

Model 3: model of total natural and rehabilitated teeth number, − 2 Log likelihood = 870.134, Cox&Snell R square = 0.074

Model 4: model of natural teeth number, − 2 Log likelihood = 883.342, Cox&Snell R square = 0.056