Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 19;8(27):14829–14832. doi: 10.1039/c8ra02224k

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name c8ra02224k-u1.jpg
Entry Cat. Hydrogen source Yield (%) ee (%)
1 (S,S)-1a HCOONa (5 equiv.) 41 93
2 (S,S)-1b HCOONa (5 equiv.) <5
3 (S,S)-1c HCOONa (5 equiv.) 80 87
4 (S,S)-1d HCOONa (5 equiv.) 83 96
5 (S,S)-1e HCOONa (5 equiv.) 78 79
6 (S,S)-1f HCOONa (5 equiv.) 79 94
7 (S,S)-1g HCOONa (5 equiv.) 84 94
8 (S,S)-1h HCOONa (5 equiv.) 95 97
9b (S,S)-1h HCOONa (5 equiv.) 24 95
10c (S,S)-1h HCOOH/NEt3 (5:2) 0
11c (S,S)-1h HCOOH/NEt3 (1.1:1) 46 95
graphic file with name c8ra02224k-u2.jpg
a

Reaction conditions: phenylacetylene (2a; 5 mmol), CF3SO3H (20 mol%), H2O (2 equiv.), CF3CH2OH (2 mL), 40 °C, 6 h; then 0.5 mol% catalyst, hydrogen source (5 equiv.), and H2O (2 mL) were added, 50 °C, 24 h. The yield was determined by GC with an internal standard (mesitylene). The ee values were determined by HPLC analysis.

b

Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) was used as a solvent.

c

0.5 mL of HCOOH/NEt3 mixture was used, the data in the brackets are molar ratio.