Skip to main content
. 2022 May 8;19:113. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01417-7

Table 2.

Fixed and random effect analysis of factors associated with unmet needs for contraception

Variable Model O Model I
AOR [95% CI]
Model II
AOR [95% CI]
Model III
AOR [95% CI]
Fixed effect results
Women’s age (years)
15–19 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
20–24 1.02 [0.69,1.52] 1.04 [0.70,1.55]
25–29 0.69 [0.45,1.06] 0.70 [0.46,1.08]
30–34 0.68 [0.44,1.06] 0.70 [0.45,1.09]
35–39 0.70 [0.44,1.12] 0.73 [0.45,1.17]
40–44 0.82 [0.53,1.29] 0.87 [0.55,1.37]
45–49 0.64 [0.39,1.03] 0.67 [0.41,1.08]
Level of education
No education 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Primary 0.92 [0.76,1.12] 0.97 [0.80,1.18]
Secondary 0.78 [0.61,1.00] 0.87 [0.67,1.13]
Higher 1.09 [0.48,2.45] 1.27 [0.56,2.88]
Marital status
Married 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Cohabiting 1.28* [1.03,1.60] 1.25* [1.01,1.56]
Current working status
No 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Yes 1.08 0.93,1.26] 1.09 [0.94,1.28]
Parity
Zero 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
1–3 births 1.57** [1.19,2.09] 1.57** [1.18,2.08]
4 or more births 1.64** [1.15,2.33] 1.60** [1.13,2.27]
Frequency of watching television
Not at all 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Less than once a week 0.80 [0.56,1.14] 0.86 [0.60,1.23]
At least once a week 0.90 [0.66,1.23] 1.01 [0.73,1.39]
Frequency of listening to radio
Not at all 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Less than once a week 0.79 [0.61,1.02] 0.80 [0.61,1.04]
At least once a week 0.78 [0.56,1.07] 0.80 [0.59,1.10]
Frequency of reading newspaper or magazine
Not at all 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Less than once a week 1.11 [0.85,1.44] 1.13 [0.86,1.49]
At least once a week 0.77 [0.53,1.12] 0.81 [0.56,1.17]
Heard of family planning from newspaper or magazine last few months
No 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Yes 1.02 [0.69,1.50] 1.05 [0.71,1.54]
Heard of family planning from television last few months
No 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Yes 1.02 [0.61,1.71] 1.05 [0.63,1.75]
Heard of family planning from radio last few months
No 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Yes 0.93 [0.72,1.21] 0.94 [0.73,1.22]
Person who usually decides on respondent’s health care
Respondent alone 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Respondent and partner 0.87 [0.72,1.06] 0.86 [0.71,1.04]
Partner alone 1.37* [1.08,1.74] 1.35* [1.06,1.71]
Someone else or other 1.20 [0.55,2.61] 1.19 [0.55,2.57]
Wealthindex
Poorest 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Poorer 0.85 [0.67,1.08] 0.86 [0.68,1.10]
Middle 0.73** [0.58,0.91] 0.75* [0.60,0.94]
Richer 0.65*** [0.51,0.83] 0.69** [0.53,0.90]
Richest 0.51*** [0.40,0.66] 0.59*** [0.43,0.80]
Sex of household head
Male 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Female 0.86 [0.68,1.09] 0.87 [0.68,1.10]
Place of residence
Urban 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Rural 1.15 [0.94,1.42] 1.08 [0.87,1.33]
Region
Southern region 1 [1.00,1.00] 1 [1.00,1.00]
Highlands region 1.07 [0.89,1.29] 1.05 [0.86,1.27]
Momase region 1.35** [1.11,1.64] 1.33** [1.09,1.63]
Islands region 1.08 [0.88,1.33] 1.10 [0.89,1.36]
Random effect model
PSU variance (95% CI) 0.398 [0.299, 0.531] 0.343 [0.251, 0.471] 0.328 [0.237, 0.453] 0.322 [0.232, 0.447]
ICC 0.1079641 0.0945348 0.0905374 .0891375
Wald chi-square Reference 115.40 (< 0.001) 86.56 (< 0.001) 169.18 (< 0.001)
Model fitness
Log-likelihood − 4839.6637 − 4755.7949 − 4799.8545 − 4735.382
AIC 9683.327 9565.59 9621.709 9542.764
N 7950 7950 7950 7950
Number of clusters 763 763 763 763

Exponentiated coefficients; 95% confidence intervals in brackets; AOR adjusted odds ratios, CI confidence interval; 1 = Reference category; PSU primary sampling unit; ICC  intra-class correlation, AIC  Akaike’s Information Criterion. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001