Skip to main content
. 2022 May 7;17:22. doi: 10.1186/s40793-022-00417-1

Table 1.

Description of the datasets

OTUs OTUs (%) Sequence abundance (%)*
All OTUsa 2926 100 100
 Bacteria 1561 53.3 50.7
 Protists 1365 46.7 49.3
Resident microbiotab 709 100 100 (85)
 Bacteria 354 49.9 53.6
 Protists 355 50.1 46.4
Core microbiotac 259 100 64.5 (54)
 Bacteria 182 70.3 46.3
 Protists 77 29.7 18.2
 Picoplankton 109 42.1 32.4
 Nanoplankton 150 57.9 32.1
Protists
 Heterotroph 5 1.9 0.3
 Photoautotroph 37 14.3 11.8
 Parasite 21 8.1 3.5
 Mixotroph 3 1.2 0.7
 Symbiont 1 0.4 0.1
 Unknown 11 4.3 2.0
Bacteria
 Photoautotroph (cyanobacteria) 19 7.3 19.3
 Non-photoautotrophd 163 62.5 26.8
Seasonal preference core OTUs
 Winter 156 60.2 21.8
 Spring 24 9.3 16.4
 Summer 44 17.0 8.2
 Autumn 30 11.6 13.7
 No seasonality 5 1.9 4.5
Seasonal subnetworks
 Winter 156 60.2 21.8
 Spring 19 7.3 13.7
 Summer 41 15.8 6.6
 Autumn 26 10.0 12.9

*In italics the abundances relative to all OTUs are indicated. All other values in normal text indicate abundances relative to OTUs in the resident microbiota

aNumber of OTUs in the full dataset that was left after quality control and rarefaction, which were present in at least 10% of the samples (i.e., 12 months, not necessarily consecutive)

bOTUs present in at least 30% of the samples (i.e., 36 months, not necessarily consecutive) [= Resident microbiota]

cOTUs included in the core network (core microbiota) with significant correlations (p < 0.001), local similarity scores > |0.7| and Spearman correlations > |0.7|, being present in at least 30% of the samples

dIncludes non-photoautotrophic lifestyles (i.e., chemoautotrophs, photoheterotrophs, chemoheterotrophs, etc.)