Table 3. Correlation between physical measurements and physiological capacities*.
Pearson correlation analysis of every physical measurement and physiological ability of players aged 13–15 years.
| 13 (y) | 5 × 25 RSA | Left T | Right T | SLJ | 10 m | 30 m | YYIR1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height | r | −0.509‡ | −0.429 | −0.369 | 0.619‡ | −0.266 | −0.552‡ | 0.215 |
| p | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.042 | <0.001 | 0.103 | |
| Body mass (kg) | r | −0.385 | −0.391 | −0.339 | 0.524‡ | −0.353 | −0.447 | 0.178 |
| p | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.009 | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.177 | |
| % Fat (%) | r | 0.374 | 0.234 | 0.210 | −0.235 | −0.298 | 0.007 | 0.206 |
| p | 0.004 | 0.074 | 0.110 | 0.074 | 0.022 | 0.960 | 0.117 | |
| C thigh | r | −0.419 | −0.334 | −0.326 | 0.491 | −0.319 | −0.444 | 0.265 |
| p | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.012 | <0.001 | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.043 | |
| 14 (y) | ||||||||
| Height | r | −0.062 | 0.058 | 0.066 | 0.546‡ | −0.107 | −0.235 | −0.207 |
| p | 0.652 | 0.669 | 0.630 | <0.001 | 0.433 | 0.081 | 0.125 | |
| Body | ||||||||
| mass (kg) | r | −0.217 | −0.064 | −0.053 | 0.586‡ | −0.084 | −0.244 | −0.075 |
| p | 0.107 | 0.641 | 0.699 | <0.001 | 0.538 | 0.070 | 0.582 | |
| % Fat (%) | r | −0.070 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.309 | −0.122 | −0.210 | 0.009 |
| p | 0.607 | 0.983 | 0.939 | 0.020 | 0.371 | 0.121 | 0.947 | |
| C thigh | r | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.047 | 0.308 | −0.303 | −0.366 | −0.276 |
| p | 0.952 | 0.852 | 0.730 | 0.021 | 0.023 | 0.006 | 0.039 | |
| 15 (y) | ||||||||
| Height | r | −0.464 | −0.469 | −0.433 | 0.215 | −0.030 | −0.202 | 0.096 |
| p | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.125 | 0.832 | 0.151 | 0.496 | |
| Body mass (kg) | r | −0.548‡ | −0.402 | −0.364 | 0.310 | −0.166 | −0.227 | 0.130 |
| p | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.025 | 0.239 | 0.106 | 0.351 | |
| % Fat (%) | r | 0.358 | 0.259 | 0.224 | 0.077 | −0.201 | −0.146 | 0.132 |
| p | 0.009 | 0.064 | 0.110 | 0.587 | 0.154 | 0.301 | 0.352 | |
| C thigh | r | 0.376 | −0.185 | −0.225 | 0.293 | 0.067 | −0.010 | −0.061 |
| p | 0.006 | 0.190 | 0.109 | 0.035 | 0.636 | 0.944 | 0.666 |
Notes:
The correlation coefficient was less than 1% and significant by two-tailed test.
r > 0.5.