Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2016 Feb 26;42(6):542–554. doi: 10.1002/ab.21649

Table 3.

Summary of Two-Step Linear Regression Analyses Used to Examine Main and Interaction Effects in a Model Predicting Frequency of Past Aggression Toward Gay Men and Lesbians While Controlling for Attitudes Toward Gay Men.


Variable
b SE rpartial p
Step 1
  Age .000 .000 −.03 .714
  Education level .000 .000 −.11 .141
  Income .000 .000 .06 .404
  Attitudes toward gay men .000 .000 .40 .000
  AIDS-related stigma .06 .03 .16 .027
  Race (White) −.03 .02 −.16 .026
  Prior contact (No) −.01 .02 −.05 .526
Step 2
  Age .000 .000 −.02 .743
  Education level .000 .000 −.12 .120
  Income .000 .000 .11 .151
  Attitudes toward gay men .000 .000 .37 .000
  AIDS-related stigma .22 .08 .21 .005
  Race (White) −.06 .04 −.13 .085
  Prior contact (No) −.03 .03 −.08 .292
  AR Stigma X Race −.16 .11 −.11 .141
  AR Stigma X Prior Contact −.21 .08 −.18 .013
  Race X Prior Contact .05 .04 .09 .223
  AR Stigma X Race X Prior Contact .22 .12 .14 .063

Note. N = 194. Values of 0.000 are less than 0.0005. AR Stigma = AIDS-related stigma. Prior Contact = prior contact with gay men and lesbians. Results of Model 2, which included all possible interaction terms involving the covariate attitudes toward gay men, were omitted because attitudes toward gay men was not a significant moderator. Whites were coded as the reference group for race. No, as opposed to yes, for prior contact with gay men and lesbians was coded as the reference group for prior contact. Thus, in regards to the present sample, this model refers to White men with no prior contact with gay men or lesbians.