Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;56(1):57–78. doi: 10.1007/s10644-022-09405-4

Table 1.

Evaluation of the strength of potential impact on the economic development

Variables (1) (2) (3)
SClogistics 0.010**
 − 0.004
Energy consump 0.003
 − 0.003
CO2 emissions 0.011***
 − 0.004
GDP(t − 1)  − 0.009***  − 0.009***  − 0.009***
 − 0.003  − 0.003  − 0.003
Financial aid 0.018*** 0.018*** 0.018***
 − 0.006  − 0.006  − 0.006
Tax cut 0.271*** 0.273*** 0.268***
 − 0.087  − 0.088  − 0.087
Subsidy 0.010** 0.011*** 0.010**
 − 0.004  − 0.004  − 0.004
Insurance 0.005 0.004 0.005
 − 0.003  − 0.003  − 0.003
Elasticity
 Logistics measure 1.439** 0.471 1.760**
 − 0.672 (0.489)  − 0.695
Cameron and Trivedi’s IM-test
 Heteroskedasticity [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
 Skewness [0.089] [0.087] [0.095]
 Kurtosis [0.140] [0.132] [0.146]
 Total [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
 Observations 522 522 522
 R-squared 0.231 0.26 0.26

Author calculation