Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;8(40):22559–22568. doi: 10.1039/c8ra02751j

Comparison of the specific capacitances of Cp-MnMoO4 and MH-MnMoO4 nanorod electrodes with the literature reports for supercapacitor applications.

S. no. Material Method Specific capacitance (F g−1) Scan rate mV s−1 (or) current density (A g−1) Ref.
1 MnMoO4 Co-precipitation 281 F g−1, 142 F g−1 10 mV s−1, 1 A g−1 Present work
2 MnMoO4 Microwave hydrothermal method 689 F g−1, 551 F g−1 10 mV s−1, 1 A g−1 Present work
3 MnMoO4 Precipitation technique 200 F g−1 1.6 A g−1 39
4 MnMoO4/graphene Hydrothermal method 364 F g−1 2 A g−1 20
5 MnMoO4 Micro-emulsion method 9.7 F g−1, 187 F g−1 1 A g−1, 1 A g−1 18
MnMoO4/CoMoO4
6 MnMoO4 nanoparticles Simple method 371 F g−1, 469 F g−1 1 A g−1, 1 A g−1 21
MnMoO4 nanorods
7 MnMoO4/PPy In situ oxidative polymerization 462.9 F g−1, 374.8 F g−1 5 mV s−1, 0.2 A g−1 40
8 MnMoO4 Hydrothermal method 234 F g−1 10 mV s−1 18
9 Amorphized MnMoO4 Hydrothermal method 373 F g−1 5 mV s−1 25
10 MnMoO4·H2O Hydrothermal method 549 F g−1 5 mV s−1 19
11 MnMoO4/polyaniline In situ oxidative polymerization 396 F g−1 5 mV s−1 23