Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;23(5):529–538. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0393

Table 4. Meta-Analytic Pooled Sensitivity and Specificity of Studies Using or Not Using the LI-RADS Diagnostic Imaging Criteria for Hpatocellular Crcinoma.

No. of Studies Pooled Sensitivity, % (95% CI) I2 Statistics, % Pooled Specificity, % (95% CI) I2 Statistics, %
LI-RADS v2013 2 50.0 (19.7, 80.3) NA* 96.0 (92.5, 100.0) NA*
LI-RADS v2014 13 61.9 (49.4, 73.0) 96.0 92.9 (89.0, 95.4) 81.2
LI-RADS v2017 9 67.0 (62.7, 71.0) 66.8 93.1 (90.0, 95.3) 48.9
LI-RADS v2018 10 77.7 (71.0, 83.3) 86.7 89.9 (86.3, 92.5) 53.2
Studies that did not use the LI-RADS diagnostic imaging criteria 69 86.3 (83.0, 89.0) 94.3 91.4 (88.9, 93.5) 86.6

*I2 statistics could not be calculated due to the small number of studies using LI-RADS v2013. CI = confidence interval, LI-RADS = Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, NA = not available