Table 2.
Table showing relative agonist efficacies and potencies of the ligands for transactivation via the GR on GRE and GILZ gene*
| Transactivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COS-1 | PBMC | |||
| GRE | GILZ | |||
| Ligand | MAX (%) ± SEM | EC50 (M) ± SEM | MAX (%) ± SEM | EC50 (M) ± SEM |
| DEX | 100 ± 2.17a | 1.07 ± 0.55×10−9a | 100 ± 4.87a | 1.91 ± 2.51×10−8a |
| MPA | 84.36 ± 3.99b | 4.17 ± 1.63×10−8a | 98.47 ± 7.09a | 2.5 ± 0.66×10−7a |
| NET | ND | ND | 6.50 ± 2.34b | 5.12 ± 9.91×10−8#a |
| LNG | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| ETG | 45.88 ± 4.97c | 3.19 ± 1.21×10−8a | 15.85 ± 2.29b | 2.04 ± 3.19×10−7a |
| NES | 55.81 ± 4.85c | 1.85 ± 0.77×10−8a | 40.70 ± 4.40c | 1.47 ± 1.01×10−7a |
Data shown in Fig. 2A and 2B, were analyzed to obtain the MAX (%) ± SEM and EC50 (M) ± SEM values for each ligand for the GR.
Statistical significance between treatment groups was determined using one-way ANOVAs with Tukey post-test.
The EC50 values for NET should be interpreted with caution as very weak agonist activity was observed.
ND-not determined.