Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Steroids. 2022 Mar 7;182:108998. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2022.108998

Table 2.

Table showing relative agonist efficacies and potencies of the ligands for transactivation via the GR on GRE and GILZ gene*

Transactivation
COS-1 PBMC
GRE GILZ
Ligand MAX (%) ± SEM EC50 (M) ± SEM MAX (%) ± SEM EC50 (M) ± SEM
DEX 100 ± 2.17a 1.07 ± 0.55×10−9a 100 ± 4.87a 1.91 ± 2.51×10−8a
MPA 84.36 ± 3.99b 4.17 ± 1.63×10−8a 98.47 ± 7.09a 2.5 ± 0.66×10−7a
NET ND ND 6.50 ± 2.34b 5.12 ± 9.91×10−8#a
LNG ND ND ND ND
ETG 45.88 ± 4.97c 3.19 ± 1.21×10−8a 15.85 ± 2.29b 2.04 ± 3.19×10−7a
NES 55.81 ± 4.85c 1.85 ± 0.77×10−8a 40.70 ± 4.40c 1.47 ± 1.01×10−7a
*

Data shown in Fig. 2A and 2B, were analyzed to obtain the MAX (%) ± SEM and EC50 (M) ± SEM values for each ligand for the GR.

a,b,c,d

Statistical significance between treatment groups was determined using one-way ANOVAs with Tukey post-test.

#

The EC50 values for NET should be interpreted with caution as very weak agonist activity was observed.

ND-not determined.