Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 25;9:809188. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.809188

Table 1.

The quality of data output.

Sample Raw reads Clean reads Raw bases (G) Clean bases (G) Error (%) Q20 (%) Q30 (%) GC (%)
AR1 22995633 22373634 5.75 5.59 0.06 91.96 85.92 50.48
AR2 28353082 27932670 7.09 6.98 0.04 94.19 89.22 50.56
AR3 21275181 21220183 5.32 5.31 0.06 92.59 86.52 50.05
ER1 23576166 23185535 5.89 5.8 0.04 94.19 89.28 49.38
ER2 18195848 18136753 4.55 4.53 0.04 96.15 92.00 48.24
ER3 21778235 21267590 5.44 5.32 0.06 91.91 85.81 49.13

Raw reads: the original sequence data was counted, four behaviors per unit, statistics of the number of sequencing sequences of each file.

Clean reads: the calculation method was the same as raw reads, but the statistical files were filtered sequencing data.

Raw bases (G): the number of original sequence data was multiplied by the length of the sequencing sequence, unit: G (data).

Clean bases (G): the number of filtered sequences multiplied by the length of the sequence, unit: G (data).

Error (%): base error rate. Q20, Q30 (%): the percentage of bases with Phred values > 20 and 30 to the total bases.

GC (%): the percentage of the total number of bases G and C to the total number of bases.