Table 2.
The relative risk of reassessment and re-investigation comparing virtual against F2F clinics adjusting for the confounding effect of age
| Age group | Relative risk (95% CI) and p value | |
| Reassessment | Re-investigation | |
| 16–24 years | 1.14 (0.11 to 11.59) | – |
| 25–39 years | 2.04 (0.82 to 5.10) | 0.55 (0.06 to 5.15) |
| 40–59 years | 1.94 (1.13 to 3.35) | 1.35 (0.66 to 2.73) |
| 60 years | 2.54 (1.31 to 4.94) | 1.86 (0.80 to 4.33) |
| Crude | 2.17 (1.49 to 3.16) | 1.50 (0.88 to 2.54) |
| Mantel-Haenszel combined | 2.09 (1.44 to 3.05) | 1.42 (0.84 to 2.40) |
| P value | 0.880 | 0.577 |
The relative difference as a measure of confounding (percentage difference) is 3.43% for reassessment and 5.21% for re-investigation. This is less likely to suggest age as confounding.
F2F, face-to-face.