Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec;45(12):3287–3292. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3287-3292.2001

TABLE 1.

Susceptibility to AMK and KAN of E. coli XL1-Blue strains

Substitutiona MIC (μg/ml)b
Susceptibility phenotypec
AMK KAN
None 0.25 0.25
pJHCMW1 (wild type) 32 192
P155A 12 48 I2
S156A 32 192 R
P157A 6 24 I2
S158A 96 256 R
N159A 0.75 32 I1
L160A 16 48 I2
R161A 24 128 R
I163A 2 24 I2
R164A 12 128 R
C165A 16 64 R
Y166A 1.5 256 Specificity
E167A 2 4 S
K168A 6 16 I2
G170A 6 96 I1
F171A 1 1.5 S
E172A 32 96 R
R173A 16 128 R
Q174A 32 128 R
G175A 32 128 R
a

All mutations were performed with pJHCMW1, and the plasmid was introduced by transformation into E. coli XL1-Blue. 

b

MICs were determined by the E-test. 

c

For the purpose of the comparisons in this paper, the susceptibility phenotypes of the mutants were divided into the following four groups: R, resistant (MICs not more than threefold lower than that for the wild type); I, intermediate levels of resistance; S, susceptible (the MICs of both antibiotics were lower than 6 μg/ml; and Specificity, the MIC of one antibiotic (AMK) was at the susceptible level and the MIC of the other (KAM) was at the resistance level. The I group was subdivided into two groups on the basis of the resistance profile conferred by these derivatives: I1, resistance related to that of Y166A (Specificity) but not as pronounced; I2, the MICs of both antibiotics between those for the R and S groups.