TABLE 2.
Stochastic actor based model results for contributions of emotion regulation to selection in friendship and conflict networks.
| Effects | Estimate | S.E. | p |
| Emotion regulation and friendship selection (path 1 in Figure 1) | |||
| Maintenance | |||
| Adaptive ER alter | –0.02 | (0.03) | |
| Adaptive ER ego | –0.53 | (0.47) | |
| Adaptive ER similarity | 1.07 | (0.51) | * |
| Maladaptive ER alter | 0.04 | (0.03) | |
| Maladaptive ER ego | –0.50 | (0.62) | |
| Maladaptive ER similarity | 0.30 | (0.67) | |
| Creation | |||
| Adaptive ER alter | –0.02 | (0.03) | |
| Adaptive ER ego | 0.47 | (0.47) | |
| Adaptive ER similarity | –0.56 | (0.54) | |
| Maladaptive ER alter | 0.01 | (0.03) | |
| Maladaptive ER ego | 0.46 | (0.62) | |
| Maladaptive ER similarity | –0.18 | (0.75) | |
| Alternative friendship selection processes (path 2) | |||
| Same female | –0.09 | (0.07) | |
| Same race | 0.16 | (0.07) | * |
| Same section | 0.56 | (0.08) | * |
| Band section leader alter | –0.03 | (0.13) | |
| Band section leader ego | –0.33 | (0.13) | * |
| Band section leader similarity | 0.02 | (0.12) | |
| Seasons alter | 0.07 | (0.04) | |
| Seasons ego | –0.03 | (0.04) | |
| Seasons similarity | 0.43 | (0.20) | * |
| Friendship network structural effects (path 3) | |||
| Rate | 12.93 | (0.87) | |
| Outdegree (density) | –2.76 | (1.18) | * |
| Reciprocity | 1.95 | (0.17) | * |
| Transitive triplets | 0.17 | (0.09) | |
| Transitive reciprocated triplets | –0.20 | (0.07) | * |
| 3-cycles | 0.04 | (0.08) | |
| Transitive ties | 0.46 | (0.12) | * |
| Balance | 0.00 | (0.04) | |
| Number of actors at dist 2 | –0.11 | (0.05) | * |
| Indegree–popularity (sqrt) | 0.26 | (0.07) | * |
| Outdegree–popularity (sqrt) | –0.18 | (0.33) | |
| Outdegree–activity (sqrt) | –0.01 | (0.26) | |
| Emotion regulation and conflict selection (path 4) | |||
| Maintenance | |||
| Adaptive ER alter | –0.10 | (0.08) | |
| Adaptive ER ego | –0.39 | (0.33) | |
| Adaptive ER similarity | 2.72 | (1.29) | * |
| Maladaptive ER alter | –0.14 | (0.11) | |
| Maladaptive ER ego | –1.08 | (0.37) | * |
| Maladaptive ER similarity | –2.57 | (2.16) | |
| Creation | |||
| Adaptive ER alter | –0.03 | (0.04) | |
| Adaptive ER ego | 0.21 | (0.27) | |
| Adaptive ER similarity | –1.44 | (0.66) | * |
| Maladaptive ER alter | –0.04 | (0.05) | |
| Maladaptive ER ego | 0.71 | (0.32) | * |
| Maladaptive ER similarity | –1.33 | (1.14) | |
| Alternative conflict selection processes (path 5) | |||
| Same race | –0.05 | (0.19) | |
| Same section | 1.99 | (0.22) | * |
| Band section leader alter | 0.55 | (0.27) | * |
| Band section leader ego | –0.12 | (0.30) | |
| Band section leader similarity | 0.32 | (0.26) | |
| Seasons alter | –0.05 | (0.10) | |
| Seasons ego | 0.18 | (0.09) | |
| Seasons similarity | 1.12 | (0.47) | * |
| Conflict network structural effects (path 6) | |||
| Rate | 4.08 | (0.48) | |
| Outdegree (density) | –6.66 | (0.58) | * |
| Reciprocity | 0.89 | (0.33) | * |
| Indegree–popularity (sqrt) | 0.30 | (0.16) | |
| Outdegree–popularity (sqrt) | 0.74 | (0.29) | * |
| Outdegree–activity (sqrt) | 0.60 | (0.16) | * |
| Cross-network effects (path 7) | |||
| Conflict to agreement effect in friend network | –0.09 | (0.17) | |
| Friend to agreement effect in conflict network | 0.70 | (0.15) | * |
ER, emotion regulation.
Convergence t-ratios for each parameter was less than 0.1. Overall maximum convergence ratio 0.12.
*p < 0.05. Goodness of fit analyses are presented in Supplementary Material.