Table 4.
Backwards stepwise logistic regression predicting cervical screening attendance
| Unstandardized Coefficients | Odds Ratio | Sig | 95.0% Confidence Interval for EXP(B) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||
| (Constant) | -11.809 | 1.521 | 0.000 | < .001 | ||
| Cervical Screening Priority | 1.089 | .195 | 2.972 | < .001 | 2.028 | 4.355 |
| Social Norms – descriptive | -0.308 | .163 | 0.734 | .059 | .534 | 1.012 |
| Social norms – healthcare professionals | -.379 | .201 | 0.685 | .060 | .461 | .1.016 |
| Memory | .941 | .185 | 2.564 | < .001 | 1.783 | 3.687 |
| Environmental context and resources | .501 | .126 | 1.651 | < .001 | 1.289 | 2.113 |
| Intention | .480 | .169 | 1.616 | .005 | 1.160 | 2.251 |
| Income | .946 | .402 | 2.575 | .018 | 1.172 | 5.656 |
Nagelkerke R Square = .733, classification 88.1% correct