Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;10(2):e001541. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001541

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment based on Downs and Black’s criteria16

Author Year Reporting Internal validity Confounding and selection bias External validity Power Total score
Banerjee et al*9 2020 18
Campbell et al23 2016 12
Chigbu et al*18 2020 17
Duan et al*28 2021 21
Eakin et al24 2018 17
Fokom Domgue et al25 2020 14
Joshi et al26 2015 20
Joshi et al*10 2013 17
Mungo et al*19 2020 19
Naud et al*22 2016 14
Pinder et al*11 2020 24
Sandoval et al*20 2019 20
Viviano et al*21 2017 21
Zhao et al*12 2021 19
Zhao et al27 2020 20

Subsections were scored green if over 80% of indicators met, orange if 40%–79% of indicators met and red if <40% of indicators met.

*Included in the meta-synthesis.