Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 25;9:881139. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.881139

TABLE 5.

Subgroup analysis for SMD of dietary beta-carotene in depression vs. control subjects.

Stratification Number of studies Pooled SMD 95% CI P-value Heterogeneity
All studies 14 −0.34 −0.48, −0.20 P < 0.001 P < 0.001; I2 = 96%
Geographical region
Asia 9 −0.43 −0.67, −0.20 P < 0.001 P < 0.001; I2 = 97%
Non−Asia 6 −0.20 −0.24, −0.16 P < 0.001 P = 0.96; I2 = 0%
Exposure assessment
FFQ 10 −0.41 −0.63, −0.18 P < 0.001 P < 0.001; I2 = 97%
Recall method 4 −0.20 −0.24, −0.16 P < 0.001 P = 0.95; I2 = 0%
Sex
Male 5 −0.63 −1.32, 0.07 P = 0.08 P < 0.001; I2 = 99%
Female 9 −0.16 −0.20, −0.12 P < 0.001 P = 0.33; I2 = 13%
Population
Adolescent 4 −0.33 −0.59, −0.06 P = 0.02 P = 0.01; I2 = 73%
Middle aged and elderly 10 −0.34 −0.50, −0.17 P < 0.001 P < 0.001; I2 = 97%
Sample size
<1,000 5 −0.27 −0.47, −0.07 P = 0.008 P = 0.02; I2 = 65%
>1,000 9 −0.35 −0.52, −0.18 P < 0.001 P < 0.001; I2 = 97%