Table 4.
In-room | Remote | P | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Trainee rating of interface | |||
Median (range) | |||
Anatomical recognition | 4.5 (1–5) | 5 (2–5) | 0.3 |
Improvement of surgical skills | 5 (2–5) | 5 (2–5) | 0.4 |
Surgical confidence | 5 (3–5) | 5 (2–5) | 0.1 |
Safety | 5 (2–5) | 5 (3–5) | 0.4 |
‘Worked well’ | 5 (4–5) | 5 (2–5) | 0.7 |
Ease of use | 5 (3–5) | 5 (2–5) | 0.7 |
Telestration helpfulness | 5 (5–5) | 5 (1–5) | 0.9 |
Mentor rating of interface | |||
Median (range) | |||
Anatomical recognition | 4 (2–5) | 4 (3–5) | 1.0 |
Improvement of surgical skills | 4 (3–5) | 4 (3–5) | 0.2 |
Surgical confidence | 5 (4–5) | 4 (4–5) | 0.3 |
Safety | 4 (4–5) | 4 (4–5) | 0.4 |
‘Worked well’ | 4.5 (3–5) | 4 (2–5) | 0.1 |
Ease of use | 4 (3–5) | 4 (4–5) | 0.8 |
Telestration helpfulness | 4 (2–4) | 4 (3–5) | 0.05 |