Table 4.
Impact of corresponding findings of TRUS in MR fusion targeted biopsy
TRUS highly suspicious (n = 52) | TRUS likely (n = 67) | TRUS unlikely (n = 8) | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
(a) | |||
MR highly suspicious (n = 50) | 39 (78 %) | 11 (22 %) | 0 (0 %) |
MR likely (n = 77) | 13 (17 %) | 56 (73 %) | 8 (10 %) |
MR/TRUS fusion Targeted Biopsy | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
TRUS highly suspicious (n = 52) | TRUS likely (n = 67) | TRUS unlikely (n = 8) | p value | |
| ||||
(b) | ||||
Positive rate per core | 150/182 (82 %) | 48/158 (30 %) | 0/14 (0 %) | <0.0001* |
Cancer core length, median (range) | 8.6 mm (0–18) | 5.3 mm (0–14) | NA | 0.01§ |
Positive for any cancer | 48/52 (92 %) | 30/67 (45 %) | 0/8 (0 %) | <0.0001* |
Gleason score (6/7/8/9/10) | 17/22/3/4/2 | 16/13/1/0/0 | NA | 0.3† |
Positive for significant prostate cancer | 39/52 (75 %) | 15/67 (22 %) | NA | <0.0001‡ |
p < 0.0001 (Spearman’s correlation coefficient by rank test)
TRUS trans-rectal ultrasound, MRI magnetic resonance imaging
Kruskal–Wallis Test
Mann–Whitney’s U test
Spearman’s correlation coefficient by rank test
Chi-square test