Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;12(22):13896–13916. doi: 10.1039/d2ra00966h

Comparison between the developed HPLC method and the reported ones.

Methods Developed HPLC method Reported method for DFX Reported method for DFP
Linearity range (μg mL−1) 0.3–20 for DFX 0.4–80 0.25–10
0.2–20 for DFP
Mobile phase Ethanol : acidic water at pH 3.0 adjusted by phosphoric acid in the ratio of (70 : 30, by volume) 50 mM ammonium acetate and 20 mM tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate buffer (pH 6.3) : acetonitrile : methanol (33 : 22 : 45, by volume) Methanol : potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM) containing heptane sulfonic acid (5 mM) adjusted the pH = 3.5 ± 0.05 with phosphoric acid (18 : 82, by volume)
Stationary phase XBridge® HPLC RP-C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) PEEK-lined ProteCol-P C18 HQ105-coated column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) Discovery supelco C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm)
Run time (min) 6 8 12
Flow rate (mL min−1) 1 1 1.2
Solvent wastea (g per run) 6 8 14.4
Wavelength (nm) 225 225 280
a

Solvent waste: (run time × flow rate).