Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 16;8(51):29189–29200. doi: 10.1039/c8ra05278f

Electrochemical modelling data of pure magnesium, PEO and PEO-CaP coated magnesium samples in SBF (mean ± SD, n = 2).

Material Time (h) CPE1−1 cm−2 sn × 10−6) n R 1 (Ω cm2) CPE2−1 cm−2 sn × 10−6) n R 2 (Ω cm2)
Pure Mg 2 48.52 ± 3.65 0.8 411.2 ± 73.54 3430.5 ± 516.89 0.9 64.82 ± 61.76
24 63.27 ± 12.16 0.8 549.1 ± 355.53 4669 ± 2402.75 0.9 190 ± 7.21
48 95.31 ± 35.33 0.6 383.57 ± 421.34 1375.48 ± 1925.47 0.9 912.5 ± 1071.27
72 56.41 ± 4.69 0.8 243.47 ± 287.69 1407.95 ± 1914.91 0.9 398.55 ± 354.61
PEO 2 20.1 ± 7.25 0.5 100.43 ± 17.1 34.1 ± 8.21 0.8 3397.33 ± 887.98
8 34.6 ± 15 0.5 221.97 ± 44.5 17.1 ± 7.47 0.8 6554.33 ± 1795.02
24 31.5 ± 27.1 0.6 341.97 ± 151.75 14.3 ± 14.5 0.9 6764.67 ± 801.3
48 54.5 ± 15.3 0.5 481.83 ± 124.4 4.06 ± 0.16 1 5267.67 ± 1504.78
72 53.2 ± 20.5 0.5 631.23 ± 100.95 3.45 ± 0.69 1 4957.33 ± 1273.79
PEO-CaP 2 1.25 ± 0.35 0.73 17 290 ± 1655 4.45 ± 0.49 0.74 340 850 ± 110 804
8 0.5 ± 0.5 0.71 4018 ± 2212 6.53 ± 0.45 0.64 198 800 ± 34 648
24 0.71 ± 0.46 0.71 2293 ± 745 9.67 ± 1.48 0.71 87 710 ± 7919
48 0.77 ± 0.32 0.72 1549 ± 242 13.51 ± 1.47 0.73 51 450 ± 8598
72 1.52 ± 0.88 0.67 1278 ± 167 15.3 ± 2.01 0.74 44 100 ± 1061