TABLE 6.
Effective factors on nutrient inefficiency in the rural and urban areas.
| Item | Rural |
Urban |
|||
| Coefficient | Z-statistics | Coefficient | Z-statistics | ||
| A. Variable | |||||
| HH-Social | HH-Age | −0.0080*** | –2.46 | −0.0023*** | –2.81 |
| HH-Educated | −0.0031* | –1.96 | −0.0027** | –2.06 | |
| HH-Sex | 0.0032 | 1.39 | 0.0013* | 1.78 | |
| HH-Married | 0.0037* | 1.62 | 0.0033* | 1.73 | |
| HH-Employee | 0.0006 | 0.29 | −0.0038** | –2.25 | |
| HH-Keeping | 0.0049** | 2.24 | −0.0082* | –1.74 | |
| N | −0.1739*** | –2.98 | –0.0373 | –0.61 | |
| N-Student | –0.0107 | –0.19 | −0.0180** | –2.10 | |
| N-Educated | 0.1071* | 1.68 | 0.0854*** | 4.20 | |
| N-Employee | −0.0551** | –1.90 | −0.1838*** | –3.87 | |
| HH-Economical | SH-Agriculture | 0.0031** | 2.10 | 0.0034*** | 5.31 |
| SH-Food | −0.0063*** | –3.44 | −0.0096*** | –4.47 | |
| DDS | −0.0117*** | –5.84 | −0.0057*** | –2.93 | |
| HH-Assets | Home | 0.0029*** | 2.72 | 0.0006 | 0.06 |
| S-Home | 0.0001 | 0.08 | −0.0007** | –2.31 | |
| Machine | −0.0012* | –1.71 | 0.0022*** | 3.02 | |
| HH-Cultural | Azeri language | −0.0559** | –1.88 | −0.0869*** | –3.17 |
| HH-Geographical | Capital city | 0.1342*** | 4.61 | 0.1868*** | 5.77 |
| Sea-Cities | 0.0162 | 0.52 | 0.0461*** | 3.18 | |
| Tropical-Cities | −0.0730** | –2.30 | −0.0588* | –1.74 | |
| B. Constant | – | 0.8692*** | 2.46 | 0.8014** | 2.55 |
*, **, *** Indicate significance at 1, 5, and 10% level, respectively.