Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;8(53):30430–30440. doi: 10.1039/c8ra04919j

Optimization of reaction conditionsa,b.

Entry Catalyst (mol%) Solventc Time Yieldd (%)
1 Catalyst free None 12 h NR
2 Catalyst free CH2Cl2 8 h NR
3 Catalyst free CHCl3 8 h NR
4 Catalyst free 1,4-Dioxane 6 h 10%
5 Catalyst free Methanol 6 h 28%
6 Catalyst free Ethanol 6 h 35%
7 Catalyst free Water 6 h 23%
8 InCl3 (10 mol%) Ethanol 3 h 53%
9 FeCl3 (10 mol%) Ethanol 3 h 55%
10 ZnO NPs (10 mol%) Ethanol 1 h 60%
11 ZrO NPs (10 mol%) Ethanol 1 h 72%
12 TiO2 NPs (10 mol%) Ethanol 1 h 78%
13 0.5% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 82%
14 1% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 86%
15 1.5% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 91%
16 2% Er doped TiO 2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 95%
17 5% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 91%
18 7% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 87%
19 10% Er doped TiO2 NPs (25 mg) Ethanol 20 min 87%
20 2% Er doped TiO2 NPs (15 mg) Ethanol 20 min 92%
21 2% Er doped TiO2 NPs (30 mg) Ethanol 20 min 95%
a

Bold row indicates the optimization condition for the reaction.

b

2-Hydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dione (1 mmol), benzene-1,2-diamine (1 mmol), N-methyl-4-piperidone (1 mmol) and 2-aminopyridine (1 mmol) were stirred with refluxing till completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC.

c

Solvents (2.0 ml).

d

Isolated yield after purification.