Skip to main content
. 2022 May 9;12:7559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10943-0

Table 2.

Peak fit parameters of the Ge 3d signal resulting from the XPS analysis shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4 Θ () Comp. Ekin (eV) ESOC (eV) FWHM (eV) α Arel (%)
(a) 0 Ag2Ge 107.45 0.56 0.33 0.12 86.7
SP 107.28 0.56 0.33 0.12 13.3
60 Ag2Ge 107.46 0.56 0.50 0.12 84.0
SP 107.29 0.56 0.50 0.12 16.0
(b) 0 SP1 107.46 0.56 0.50 0.13 29.7
SP2 107.08 0.56 0.50 0.13 26.3
SP3 106.82 0.56 0.50 0.13 44.0
60 SP1 107.45 0.56 0.50 0.13 31.2
SP2 107.07 0.56 0.50 0.13 21.2
SP3 106.81 0.56 0.50 0.13 47.7
(c) 0 SP 107.26 0.57 0.40 0.08 43.7
germ. 107.10 0.57 0.51 0.08 56.4
60 SP 107.27 0.57 0.40 0.08 33.1
germ. 107.12 0.57 0.51 0.08 66.9
(d) 0 germ. 107.18 0.57 0.54 0.08 100.0
60 germ. 107.18 0.57 0.54 0.08 100.0

Each component consists of a convolution of a Doniach-Sunjic profile with asymmetry parameter α and a Gaussian.