Table 3.

Peak fit parameters of the Ag 3d signal resulting from the XPS analysis shown in Fig. 5.

Figure 5	$\mathrm{\Theta }$ ${(}^{\circ })$	comp.	$E_{\mathrm{kin}}$ $(\text{eV})$	$E_{\mathrm{SOC}}$ $(\text{eV})$	$\mathrm{FWHM}$ $(\text{eV})$	$\alpha$	$A_{\mathrm{rel}}$ $(\%)$
(a)	0	Ag	107.49	6.00	0.78	0.02	63.1
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	107.34	6.00	0.67	0.02	36.4
		P1	103.44		1.10	0.00	0.4
		P2	97.44		1.11	0.00	0.0
	60	Ag	107.48	6.00	0.78	0.02	54.6
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	107.33	6.00	0.67	0.02	43.9
		P1	103.43		1.10	0.00	0.9
		P2	97.43		1.11	0.00	0.5
(b)	0	SP	107.36	6.00	0.76	0.02	33.7
		Ag	106.88	6.00	0.78	0.02	49.8
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	106.73	6.00	0.67	0.02	16.6
	60	SP	107.41	6.00	0.76	0.02	35.3
		Ag	106.93	6.00	0.78	0.02	41.3
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	106.78	6.00	0.67	0.02	23.4
(c)	0	Ag	107.46	6.00	0.78	0.02	92.7
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	107.31	6.00	0.67	0.02	7.3
	60	Ag	107.46	6.00	0.78	0.02	78.6
		${\text{Ag}}_2\text{Ge}$	107.31	6.00	0.67	0.02	21.4
(d)	0	Ag	107.68	6.00	0.77	0.02	100.0
	60	Ag	107.64	6.00	0.77	0.02	100.0

Each component consists of a convolution profile of a Doniach-Sunjic distribution with asymmetry parameter $\alpha$ and a Gaussian.