Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 30;34(2):117–130. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.02.07

Table 2. Summary of results of trails concerning PD-1 inhibitors.

Study Drugs Subgroup No. ORR (%) mPFS (month) mOS (month)
PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; ORR, objective response rate; mPFS, median progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; CPS, combined positive score; NA, not available.
KEYNOTE-
012 (24)
Pembrolizumab TNBC 27 NA 1.9 11.2
KEYNOTE-
086(A) (25)
Pembrolizumab mTNBC 170 5.3 2.0 9.0
PD-L1+ (CPS≥1) 105 5.7 2.0 8.8
PD-L1− (CPS<1) 64 4.7 1.9 9.7
KEYNOTE-
086(B) (27)
Pembrolizumab TNBC 84 21.4 2.1 18.0
KEYNOTE-
119 (26)
Pembrolizumab/
single-agent
chemotherapy
TNBC (Pemb) vs. TNBC (chemo) 312 vs. 310 9.6 vs. 10.6 2.1 vs. 3.3 9.9 vs. 10.8
PD-L1+ (CPS≥1) (Pemb vs. chemo) 203vs. 202 12.0 vs. 9.0 2.1 vs. 3.1 10.7 vs. 10.2
PD-L1+ (CPS≥10) (Pemb vs. chemo) 96 vs. 98 18.0 vs. 9.0 2.1 vs. 3.4 12.7 vs. 11.6
PD-L1+ (CPS≥20) (Pemb vs. chemo) 57 vs. 52 26.0 vs. 12.0 3.4 vs. 2.4 14.9 vs. 12.5
KEYNOTE-
355 (40)
Chemotherapy +
pembrolizumab/
placebo
ITT 566vs. 281 40.8 vs. 37.0 7.5 vs. 5.6 17.2 vs.15.5
PD-L1+ (CPS≥1) 425 vs. 211 44.9 vs. 38.9 7.6 vs. 5.6 17.6 vs. 16.0
PD-L1+ (CPS≥10) 220 vs, 103 52.7 vs. 40.8 9.7 vs. 6.5 23.0 vs. 16.1
TONIC (41) Nivolumab+ 1) without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction/2) irradiation (3 × 8 Gy)/3) cyclophosphamide/4) cisplatin/5) doxorubicin Overall cohort 66 20 1.9 NA
Without induction or with 2-week low-dose induction 12 17 NA NA
Irradiation 12 8.0 NA NA
Cyclophosphamide 12 8.0 NA NA
Cisplatin 13 23.0 NA NA
Doxorubicin 17 35.0 NA NA
KEYNOTE-
162 (44)
Niraparib +
pembrolizumab
Full analysis 47 21.0 2.3 NA
tBRCAmut 15 47.0 8.3 NA
tBRCAwt 27 11.0 2.1 NA
tBRCAunknow 5 0 2.5 NA
PD-L1 unknown 6 0 NA NA
NCT03394287
(20)
Apatinib +
camrelizumab
All population 40 32.5 NA NA
Intermittent dosing 10 0 1.9 9.5
Continuous dosing 30 43.3 3.7 8.1