Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;13:878764. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.878764

TABLE 6.

CTPF model-predicted 1-, 2-, and 3-year accumulative survive rate of patients at different CTPF stage.

CTPF stage 1-year cumulative survival rate% 2-year cumulative survival rate% 3-year cumulative survival rate %
I a 96.90 91.77 89.11
I b 94.15 84.83 80.20
I c 90.68 76.56 69.88
II a 92.79 81.51 76.02
II b 86.64 67.60 59.15
II c 79.23 52.96 42.63
III a 91.23 77.84 71.46
III b 83.89 61.90 52.55
III c 75.18 45.89 35.18

Notes: CTPF, stage: CTPF-based comprehensive stage. I a: CT, stage I and PF, grade a; I b: CT, stage I and PF, grade b; I c: CT, stage I and PF, grade c; II a: CT, stage II, and PF, grade a; II b: CT, stage II, and PF, grade b; II c: CT, stage II, and PF, grade c; III a: CT, stage III, and PF, grade a; III b: CT, stage III, and PF, grade b; III c: CT, stage III, and PF, grade c.

CT I: honeycomb lesion area was <5% of the entire lung. CT II: honeycomb lesion area was 5–25% of the entire lung. CT III: honeycomb lesion area was >25%. The PF-based grade was determined by assessing the scores of age, gender, FVC%pred, DLco%pred, and SpO2% according to the criteria in Table 3 and adding the scores. PF (a): score 0–3. PF(b): score 4–6. PF(c): score 7–10.