TABLE 6.
CTPF model-predicted 1-, 2-, and 3-year accumulative survive rate of patients at different CTPF stage.
| CTPF stage | 1-year cumulative survival rate% | 2-year cumulative survival rate% | 3-year cumulative survival rate % |
|---|---|---|---|
| I a | 96.90 | 91.77 | 89.11 |
| I b | 94.15 | 84.83 | 80.20 |
| I c | 90.68 | 76.56 | 69.88 |
| II a | 92.79 | 81.51 | 76.02 |
| II b | 86.64 | 67.60 | 59.15 |
| II c | 79.23 | 52.96 | 42.63 |
| III a | 91.23 | 77.84 | 71.46 |
| III b | 83.89 | 61.90 | 52.55 |
| III c | 75.18 | 45.89 | 35.18 |
Notes: CTPF, stage: CTPF-based comprehensive stage. I a: CT, stage I and PF, grade a; I b: CT, stage I and PF, grade b; I c: CT, stage I and PF, grade c; II a: CT, stage II, and PF, grade a; II b: CT, stage II, and PF, grade b; II c: CT, stage II, and PF, grade c; III a: CT, stage III, and PF, grade a; III b: CT, stage III, and PF, grade b; III c: CT, stage III, and PF, grade c.
CT I: honeycomb lesion area was <5% of the entire lung. CT II: honeycomb lesion area was 5–25% of the entire lung. CT III: honeycomb lesion area was >25%. The PF-based grade was determined by assessing the scores of age, gender, FVC%pred, DLco%pred, and SpO2% according to the criteria in Table 3 and adding the scores. PF (a): score 0–3. PF(b): score 4–6. PF(c): score 7–10.