. 2018 Oct 1;8(59):33652–33658. doi: 10.1039/c8ra06381h

Comparison of the lithium-storage performance between this work and reported SiO₂-based anode materials previously.

Materials	Current density	Initial discharge specific capacity (mA h g⁻¹)/coulombic efficiency (%)	Reversible capacity (mA h g⁻¹)/cycle number (n)	Rate performance (higher current density)/specific capacity (mA h g⁻¹)	Ref.
Nanostructured SiO₂	7 mA g⁻¹	270/47	ca. 120/50	100 mA g⁻¹/80	43
SiO₂ nanobelts	100 mA g⁻¹	1723/50	1012/100	1000 mA g⁻¹/574	46
Hollow porous SiO₂ nanocubes	100 mA g⁻¹	3084/47	919/30	—	31
SiO₂ thin film	28 μA cm⁻²	539/71	510/100	—	29
SiO₂ nanotubes	100 mA g⁻¹	1040/43.3	1266/100	400 mA g⁻¹/814	30
SiO₂ nanospheres	0.1 C	2420/44	876/500	2 C/1085	14
Multi-shell hollow SiO₂ microspheres	100 mA g⁻¹	792.5/53.9	750/550	2400 mA g⁻¹/95	47
SiO₂ nanowire arrays	200 mA g⁻¹	2252.6/60.7	545.4/400	2500 mA g⁻¹/315	This work

Comparison of the lithium-storage performance between this work and reported SiO2-based anode materials previously.