Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;16:867281. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.867281

Table 3.

Imagined speech classification methods summary (continuation).

References Task Methods Brain area and waves Performance
Arjestan et al. (2016) Binary classification vowels, syllables, and resting state - CSP - All areas Vowels: 76.6% best accuracy
- SVM − 8–45 Hz bandpass Syllables: 76.4% best accuracy
Sereshkeh et al. (2017) Binary classification of “yes,” “no,” and rest state - Multilayer perceptron - All areas 70% Average accuracy
- DWT − 0–50 Hz bandpass
- RMS / SD
Nguyen et al. (2017) Classification of vowels, short, and long words - Riemannian Manifold - Broca's area, the motor cortex and Wernicke's area - Vowels: 49% Average accuracy
- RVM − 8–70 Hz bandpass - Short words: 50.1% Average accuracy
- CSP / WT - Long words: 66.2% Average accuracy
- S-L: 80.1% Average accuracy
Paul et al. (2018) Classification of three Hindi vowels - SVM - Broca's and Wernicke's area 63% Average accuracy
- AR coefficients − 0.1–36 Hz bandpass
- Hjorth parameters
- Sample entropy
Cooney et al. (2018) Classification of seven phonemic prompts and four words - SVM - All areas - Phonemes: 20% Average accuracy
- Decision Tree − 1–50 Hz bandpass - Pair of words: 44% Average accuracy
- MFCC
- ICA