Table 3.

Student evaluation of course (n = 16–26)

	Strongly disagree	Slightly disagree	Neutral/ ambivalent	Slightly agree	Strongly agree
The course was well-organized	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (11.5%)	23 (88.5%)
This course has prepared me to work more effectively in resource-limited settings	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	12 (46.2%)	14 (53.8%)
The course content is appropriate for my level of training and experience	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	11 (42.3%)	15 (57.7%)
I would recommend this course to my classmates and colleagues	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (7.7%)	24 (92.3%)
The guest lecturers were well prepared and knowledgeable	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	26 (100.0%)
The practical skill sessions helped clarify the instruction	0 (0%)	1 (3.8%)	4 (15.4%)	11 (42.3%)	10 (38.5%)
A video-conferencing platform was an effective way to learn global health knowledge	0 (0%)	2 (7.7%)	2 (7.7%)	8 (30.8%)	14 (53.8%)
A video-conferencing platform was an effective way to learn global health practice	2 (7.7%)	8 (30.8%)	7 (26.9%)	4 (15.4%)	5 (19.2%)