Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 26;16:831761. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.831761

TABLE 1.

Evidence for immune activation in functional dyspepsia at the cellular level.

Findings Associations Methods Population Study details
Duodenal mucosal immune activation
Eosinophil infiltration and degranulation H&E, EM 20 pediatric FD (Rome II), uncontrolled United States, 2002 (Friesen et al., 2002)
↑ Epithelial CD8+ CD3+ cell infiltration Flow cytometry 6 H. pylori+ FD (Rome II) vs. 12 HC France, 2007 (Gargala et al., 2007)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration ∼ early satiety H&E 51 NUD (Rome II) vs. 48 HC Sweden, 2007 (Talley et al., 2007)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration H&E 51 NUD (Rome II) vs. 48 HC Sweden, 2009 (Walker et al., 2009)
↑ Presence of CD8+ T cell aggregates ∼ gastric emptying IHC 12 presumed pi FD vs. 12 unspecified FD Belgium, 2009 (Kindt et al., 2009a)
↑ CD68+ cells
↑ Histological duodenitis ∼ epigastric burning H&E, IHC, IF 35 presumed pi FD (Rome III) vs. 20 HC Japan, 2010 (Futagami et al., 2010)
↑ Eosinophil, CD68+ cell and CCR2+ macrophage infiltration
↑ Eosinophil infiltration ∼ allergy H&E 19 PDS (Rome III) vs. 89 HC United Kingdom, 2010 (Walker et al., 2010)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration ∼ TJ gene expression IHC 15 FD (Rome III) vs. 15 HC Belgium, 2014 (Vanheel et al., 2014)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration ∼ PDS symptoms & abdominal pain H&E 33 FD (Rome II) vs. 22 HC Australia, 2014 (Walker et al., 2014)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration ∼ neuronal responses & PDS symptoms IF (submucosa) 18 FD (Rome III) vs. 20 HC Belgium, 2015 (Cirillo et al., 2015)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration and degranulation H&E, IHC, TB 141 FD (Rome III) vs. 39 HC China, 2015 (Wang et al., 2015)
↑ Mast cell infiltration and degranulation TB 48 FD (Rome III) vs. 21 HC China, 2015 (Yuan et al., 2015a, b)
↑ Eosinophil degranulation IHC 96 FD (Rome III) vs. 24 HC China, 2016 (Du et al., 2016)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration IF 9 FD (Rome III) vs. 5 HC Japan, 2016 (Tanaka et al., 2016)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration ∼ weight loss H&E 36 pediatric FD (Rome III) vs. 36 HC Australia, 2017 (Wauters et al., 2017)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration, eosinophil degranulation IHC, EM 24 FD (Rome III) vs. 37 HC Belgium, 2018 (Vanheel et al., 2018)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration and degranulation ∼ presence of fine nerve fibers H&E, EM 51 FD (Rome III) vs. 35 HC South Korea, 2019 (Lee et al., 2019)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration IHC 35 FD (Rome III) vs. 31 HC Japan, 2019 (Taki et al., 2019)
Eosinophil degranulation ∼ FD symptoms H&E 178 FD (Rome II) vs. 249 HC United States, 2020 (Järbrink-Sehgal et al., 2020)
↑ Eosinophil infiltration ∼ FD & PDS symptoms H&E 42 FD (Rome III) vs. 42 HC Bangladesh, 2020 (Sarkar et al., 2020)
↑ Mast cell infiltration ∼ GI symptoms IF (submucosa) 13 FD (Rome III) vs. 24 HC Italy/Belgium, 2020 (Giancola et al., 2020)
↑ Eosinophil and mast cell infiltration ∼ FD symptoms H&E, IHC 28 FD (Rome IV) vs. 30 HC Belgium, 2021 (Wauters et al., 2021a)
Gastric mucosal immune activation
↑ Histological gastritis H&E 35 presumed pi FD (Rome III) vs. 20 HC Japan, 2010 (Futagami et al., 2010)
↑ EC infiltration, mast cell and EC activation IHC 30 presumed pi FD (Rome III) vs. 20 HC China, 2010 (Li et al., 2010)
↓ CD206+ macrophage and ICC abundance IHC (myenteric plexus) 9 FD (Rome III) vs. 9 HC United States, 2021 (Pasricha et al., 2021)
Systemic immune activation
↑ CD3+ CD45RO+ CD45RA+ cells Flow cytometry 23 FD (Rome II) vs. 32 HC Belgium, 2009 (Kindt et al., 2009b)
↑ CD4+ α4β7+ CCR9+ cells ∼ GI symptoms & gastric emptying Flow cytometry 45 FD (Rome II) vs. 35 HC Australia, 2011 (Liebregts et al., 2011)

H&E: hematoxylin & eosin, EM: electron microscopy, FD: functional dyspepsia, NUD: non-ulcer dyspepsia, HC: healthy control, IHC: immunohistochemistry, pi: post-infectious, IF: immunofluorescence, PDS: postprandial distress syndrome, TJ: tight junction, TB: toluidine blue, GI: gastrointestinal, EC: enterochromaffin cells, ICC: interstitial cell of Cajal.