Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 28;52(7):1120–1128. doi: 10.1002/eji.202249824

Table 1.

Frequency of binding (BAB) and neutralizing (NAB) antibodies to IFN‐I (IFN‐α and IFN‐β), demographic and clinical parameters of COVID‐19 patients

COVID‐19 patients Anti‐IFN‐α/β BAB negative Anti‐IFN‐α BAB positive Anti‐IFN‐β BAB positive Anti‐IFN‐α NAB positive^ Anti‐IFN‐β NAB positive
Total n = 360 299/360 (83) 27/360 (7.5) 37/360 (10.3) 13/360 (3.6) 1/360 (0.3)
Gender
Male (n = 249) 202/299 (67.6) *24/27 (88.9) **24/37 (64.9) ***11/13 (84.6) 0/1 (0)
Female (n = 111) 97/299 (32.4) 3/27 (11.1) 13/37 (35.1) 2/13 (15.4) 1/1 (100)
Age
Δ <60 years (n = 156) 132/299 (44.1) 11/27 (40.7) 14/37 (37.8) 4/13 (30.8) 1/1 (100)
≥60 years (n = 201) 165/299 (55.2) 15/27 (55.6) 23/37 (62.2) 9/13 (69.2) 0/1
ICU admission 42/299 (14) 4/14 (28.6) 4/35 (11.4) °10/13 (76.9) 1/1 (10
Death rate 32/299 (10.7) 3/14 (21.4) 4/35 (11.4) °10/13 (76.9) 1/1 (100)

Data are expressed as total number (%) of COVID‐19 patients negative to anti‐IFN‐I BAB or positive to anti‐IFN‐α or ‐β BAB and NAB.

^Anti‐IFN‐α NAB were detected against IFN‐α2 subtype and multiple IFN‐α subtypes contained in the natural IFN‐α preparation (IFN‐αn1, Wellferon Glaxo Wellcome, Beckenham, United Kingdom). Statistical analysis was performed using Yates Chi‐square.

* p < 0.0001 for anti‐IFN‐α BAB of male patients versus anti‐IFN‐α BAB of female patients.

** p = 0.02 for anti‐IFN‐β BAB of male patients versus anti‐IFN‐β BAB of female patients.

*** p = 0.0017 for anti‐IFN‐α NAB of male patients versus anti‐IFN‐α NAB of female patients.

° < 0.0001 for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death rate of anti‐IFN‐α NAB positive patients versus anti‐IFN‐α BAB positive and negative ones.

p = 0.0424 for ICU of anti‐IFN‐β NAB positive patients versus anti‐IFN‐β BAB positive and negative ones.

p = 0.0175 for death rate of anti‐IFN‐β NAB positive patients versus anti‐IFN‐β BAB positive and negative ones. ΔData are available for 357 out of 360 COVID‐19 patients.