Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268325

Fig 3. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risk from interaction models for the association between developmental vulnerability for each of the five Australian Early Developmental Census (AEDC) domains.

Fig 3

a) Physical Health and Wellbeing, b) Social Competence, c) Emotional Maturity, d) Language and Cognitive Skills (school-based), and e) Communication Skills and General Knowledge and post-birth interpregnancy intervals (IPIs). Post-birth IPI was defined as the time between the birth of the child in the cohort and the start of pregnancy of their next youngest sibling (birth date of cohort child minus gestational age of the subsequent child, measured in completed weeks of gestation). The proportion of the study population classified as developmentally vulnerable overlayed with the relative risk of developmental vulnerability for each outcome. Developmental vulnerability was defined as scores in the bottom decile, based on the 2009 AEDC cut-offs. Adjusted model based on pooled analysis from 20 imputed datasets, controlling for; sex of child and age of the child at the time of AEDC completion, maternal smoking status during pregnancy, preterm birth, small for gestational age, parity, maternal age at the time of child’s birth, the child speaks a language other than English at home, ethnicity of child, preschool attendance, maternal marital status at the time of child’s birth, maternal and paternal occupation status, Accessibility and Remoteness Index of Australia category, Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage category. All data is presented with 95% confidence intervals: modified Poisson Regression.