Skip to main content
Disease Markers logoLink to Disease Markers
. 2022 May 3;2022:8550714. doi: 10.1155/2022/8550714

Grey Matter Hypertrophy and Atrophy in Early-Blind Adolescents: A Surface-Based Morphometric Study

Fen Hou 1, Hengguo Li 2, Ping Li 1, Hongrong Shen 1, Yu Yang 1, Bo Li 1, Long Qian 3, Yang Fan 4, Hai Li 4, Gangqiang Hou 5, Wentao Jiang 5, Zhifeng Zhou 5,, Xia Liu 5,
PMCID: PMC9090530  PMID: 35557871

Abstract

Objective

This study is aimed at exploring the regional changes in brain cortical morphology (thickness, volume, and surface area) in the early-blind adolescents (EBAs) by using the surface-based morphometric (SBM) method.

Methods

High-resolution structural T1-weighted images (T1WI) of 23 early-blind adolescents (EBAs) and 21 age- and gender-matched normal-sighted controls (NSCs) were acquired. Structural indices, including cortical thickness (CT), cortical volume (CV), and surface area (SA), were analyzed by using FreeSurfer software, and the correlations between structural indices and the blindness duration were computed by Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

Compared to controls, EBAs had significantly reduced CV and SA mainly in the primary visual cortex (V1) and decreased CV in the left vision-related cortices (r-MFC). There were no regions that EBAs had a significantly larger CV or SA than NSCs. EBAs had significantly increased CT in the V1 and strongly involved the visual cortex (right lateral occipital gyrus, LOG.R) and the left superior temporal gyrus (STG.L), while it had decreased CT in the left superior parietal lobule (SPL.L) and the right lingual gyrus (LING.R). Additionally, no correlation was found between cortical morphometric measures and clinical variables in the EBA group.

Conclusions

SBM is a useful method for detecting human brain structural abnormalities in blindness. The results showed that these structural abnormalities in the visual cortex and visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex in the EBAs not only may be influenced by neurodevelopment, degeneration, plasticity, and so on but also involved the interaction of these factors after the early visual deprivation.

1. Introduction

Blindness provides a rare model to explore the impacts of visual experience on the structural and functional organization of the human brain [15]. A number of studies have investigated brain structural abnormalities in early-blind people. These findings include changes of the local brain structures, such as significantly volumetric atrophy of gray matter [611], decreased SA [12, 13], increased CT [1219], and impaired white matter integrity [20], as well as alterations of the brain structural networks, such as decreased network efficiency in the blind individuals [21].

However, most of them were based on volumetric measures, using voxel-based morphology (VBM) or deformation-based morphometry (DBM), which may conceal fine anatomic details in other features. Several VBM [68] and DBM [10] studies have observed significant volumetric atrophy of gray matter (GM) throughout the visual cortex in early-blind (EB) subjects [68, 10]. A more effective morphometry analysis tool than VBM and DBM is the SBM method which provides fine anatomic details in other features, such as CT and SA, and profoundly probe determining factors of CV approximated by multiplying CT by SA [22]. Previous SBM studies of blindness have shown decreased CV and SA [12, 13] and increased CT [1219] in the occipital lobe. These changes may be accountable for following factors: neurodevelopment, degeneration, and plasticity [23, 24]. Previous research [25] indicated that degeneration and neurodevelopment may cause axonal damage and synapses interruption, which could lead to the reduced CV, SA, and CT of the visual cortex in the blind. However, other researches [2628] concluded that plasticity and neurodevelopment may cause strengthened subcortical and corticocortical connections and reduced synaptic pruning, which could lead to the increased CV, SA, and CT in the visual cortex. From these previous results, we learned that these major factors, namely, neurodevelopment, degeneration, and plasticity, may influence differently on determining measures such as CV, SA, and CT. Therefore, these measures may change in even opposite directions (like a decreased CV or SA and an increased CT) under the interactions of these factors. However, the interactions of these factors remain to be not clearly understood.

In addition, these early blindness studies focused on the structural reorganization of the visual cortex, but the visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex in the blind have few been reported. Previous MRI studies of blindness reported reduced cortical thickness in the visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex (anterior STG and SPL) and increased cortical thickness in the visual cortex [12, 17]. Thus, whether the alteration mechanism in the thickness of the nonvisual cortex is as same as the visual cortex remains to be determined. Furthermore, it is interesting to explore the impact of the critical developmental period on the structural reorganization of these regions and the correlation between these structural indices and the blindness duration.

To elucidate these questions, in this study, we investigated cortical morphology (CT, CV, and SA) alterations in the visual cortex and visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex in the EBAs using a surface-based morphometric method [29]. We aimed to investigate the major factor(s) (neurodevelopment and/or degeneration and/or plasticity) how to play an interactive role in structural reorganization and possible neurological mechanism of structural reorganization in the blind.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Twenty-three EBAs (loss of sight at birth or within 1 year, 8 female, range = 11-18 years, mean age ± S.D.: 14.80 ± 2.07 years) were recruited from the Guangdong Province Blind School. Twenty-one NSCs (normal-sighted controls, NSCs) of volunteers (10 female, range = 11-19 years, mean age ± S.D.: 14.56 ± 2.59 years) participated in the study. Analysis of two-sample T-test did not indicate any significant difference in age (t = 0.33, P = 0.74), and a chi-squared test did not reveal a gender effect (X2 = 0.75, P = 0.39) between the EBA and NSC groups. Causes of blindness included retinopathy of prematurity, congenital retinal lesions, congenital glaucoma, and congenital cataracts. All participants met the following inclusion criteria: (1) right-handedness, (2) no history of neurological or psychiatric diseases and identifiable MRI normal structural brain, and (3) normal hearing. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, and all subjects and their guardians signed a written informed consent form before undergoing the MRI examinations.

2.2. Data Acquisition

High-resolution 3D T1-weighted BRAVO images were obtained on a 3.0-Tesla MR scanner (Discovery MR750 System; General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA), fitted with an 8-channel head coil. The parameters were as follows: flip angle = 12°, TR = 8.2 ms, TE = 3.2 ms, FOV = 256 × 256 mm2, 256 × 256 matrix, slice gap = 0 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, and 172 slices in the axial plane. Total scan time was 3 min 17 sec. During this MR scan, the subject's head was fixed using several foam cushions to minimize head motion.

2.3. Image Analysis

3D T1-weighted MRI data were processed and analyzed using FreeSurfer V6.0 [30, 31] (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) with a standard cross-sectional pipeline. Starting from nonuniform intensity normalization, removal of nonbrain tissue, transformation to Talairach space, skull stripping, segmentation into white-matter (WM) and gray-matter (GM), and tessellation into the WM and GM boundary, an initial surface was constructed. This surface was used to reconstruct the final cortical surface after smoothed, inflated, and automated topology correction. The cortical thickness measurements were produced by calculating the distance between these surfaces at each point across the cortical mantle [32]. The cortical thickness was compared node by node, and the statistical results were visualized by creating an average template and registering the cortical surface for each subject to it by a surface-based registration method [30, 31]. The cortex was parcellated, and the means of CT, CV, and SA were obtained at each point on the reconstructed surface. Finally, a heat kernel (10 mm width) was used to smooth the data of CT, CV, and SA to improve the normality of the data.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Firstly, the obtained structural indicators were compared between groups based on vertices. For each hemisphere, the General Linear Model (GLM) with vertex-wise analyses of surface morphometric measurements, including CT, CV, and SA, was performed in EBA and NSC groups. Statistical maps were generated using FreeSurfer's Query, Design, Estimate, Contrast (QDEC) interface. Age and gender were introduced in the model as nuisance factors. Finally, multiple comparisons were corrected with Monte Carlo Simulation using a vertex-level P value set at <0.01, and cluster-level threshold P < 0.05. In addition, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 23.0; IBM Corporation, NY, USA) was applied in all demographics analysis and the correlation analysis between cortical morphometric measures and subjects' age in both groups. Simultaneously, the correlation between cortical morphometric measures and blindness duration in the EBA group was examined. A two-tailed value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Compared to controls, EBAs had significantly increased CT in the left pericalcarine (pCAL.L), left cuneus (CUN.L), left superior temporal gyrus (STG.L), and right lateral occipital gyrus (LOG.R), while they had decreased CT in left superior parietal lobule (SPL.L) and right lingual gyrus (LING.R). In terms of the CV, EBAs had significant CV loss in bilateral pCAL and left rostral middle frontal gyrus when comparing with NSCs, and there were no CV increased regions found in EBAs. Regarding the SA, EBAs had significantly reduced SA in bilateral pCAL and LING and left cuneus (CUN.L) compared to NSCs. No larger SA was observed in EBAs in comparison to NSCs. The detailed data are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Additionally, no significant differences in the demographic characteristics were noted and no correlation was found between cortical morphometric measures and clinical variables in both groups (P > 0.05).

Table 1.

The significant altered cortical morphometry regions in EBA when compared with the NSC group.

Cortical morphometrics Brain regions Max VtxMax Size (mm2) MNIX MNIY MNIZ CWP NVtxs
CT of left hemisphere Superior parietal lobule -5.693 19424 65.24 -26.9 -52.6 62.4 0.0002 131
Cuneus 5.055 68981 64.45 -4.6 -70.3 13.7 0.0002 80
Pericalcarine 3.454 112523 44.64 -8.6 -92.5 7.4 0.01157 44
Lingual 3.635 56056 41.46 -16.7 -87.6 -8.3 0.01931 42
Pericalcarine 4.816 28560 38.47 -23.8 -68.9 7.6 0.03332 97
Superior temporal gyrus 4.332 84916 36.35 -60.4 -14.8 -3 0.04996 74
CT of right hemisphere Lateral occipital gyrus 4.3 136992 50.41 13.2 -100.6 3.7 0.0042 68
Lingual -4.572 148749 39.79 25.8 -46.8 -6.4 0.02761 69
CV of left hemisphere Pericalcarine -5.638 75563 137.23 -14.8 -81.3 7.4 0.0002 264
Pericalcarine -3.068 29579 11.77 -13.3 -85.8 7.1 0.0014 21
Rostral middle frontal gyrus -3.424 4470 11.23 -32 31.7 34.9 0.0016 15
CV of right hemisphere Pericalcarine -4.575 86494 11.35 15.1 -75 6.4 0.0026 18
Pericalcarine -4.192 61382 8.49 7 -84.1 8.4 0.02997 11
SA of left hemisphere Pericalcarine -5.796 128114 155.1 -12.1 -77.7 3.7 0.0002 260
Pericalcarine -5.497 158064 146.1 -21.1 -71.3 7.8 0.0002 291
Pericalcarine -5.581 41148 70.84 -13.6 -90.8 3 0.0002 86
Pericalcarine -6.195 39176 52.31 -6.1 -91.9 7.8 0.0002 55
Pericalcarine -4.742 126455 41.71 -7.1 -85.4 11.1 0.0002 56
Lingual -5.064 162439 21.18 -26.3 -65.3 2.4 0.0002 56
Cuneus -5.263 158481 17.78 -4.9 -91.6 8.4 0.0002 19
Lingual -4.92 17525 16.56 -4.1 -83.3 -0.8 0.0002 23
Cuneus -3.621 135774 15.94 -3.7 -77.8 13 0.0002 23
Cuneus -3.461 39164 11.3 -4.7 -88.4 17.8 0.0016 13
Cuneus -4.573 68974 9.96 -7.1 -71.3 16 0.00519 14
Lingual -3.504 114632 9.52 -7.7 -84 -5.2 0.00878 7
Lingual -5.023 162465 8.44 -16.4 -64.3 0.4 0.02662 13
Lingual -3.355 139407 7.99 -21.6 -62.4 -0.1 0.04528 14
SA of right hemisphere Pericalcarine -4.964 25443 99.08 12.4 -88 1.3 0.0002 141
Pericalcarine -5.676 161917 90.23 6.7 -80.6 1.4 0.0002 112
Lingual -5.595 132374 68.78 16.4 -69.2 3.7 0.0002 104
Pericalcarine -6.278 86238 66.94 13.8 -85.9 8.1 0.0002 90
Pericalcarine -4.442 27615 23.38 8.8 -84 8.9 0.0002 30
Pericalcarine -5.256 135388 15.09 24.3 -66.1 7.6 0.0002 35
Pericalcarine -5.472 43531 13.78 19 -70.7 10.2 0.0004 26
Lingual -4.629 35860 12.7 5.3 -67.9 6.1 0.0006 23
Lingual -4.082 22548 9.47 18.6 -80.2 -12.1 0.01355 8
Lingual -3.719 90574 8.94 8.4 -77.4 -1.8 0.0199 8
Pericalcarine -4.312 156632 8.9 13.6 -91.7 7.1 0.0203 15
Pericalcarine -3.263 118284 8.65 16.1 -94.8 3.4 0.02642 10
Lingual -3.418 95382 8.63 8.3 -61.5 1.3 0.02662 16

Abbreviations: EBA: early-blind adolescents; NSC: normal-sighted controls; CT: cortical thickness; CV: cortical volume; SA: surface area; MNIX, Y, Z:the MNI coordinate of peak vertex; VtsMax: number of peak vertex of the significant cluster; CWP: cluster-wise probability and the nominal P value; NVtxs: number of vertices in cluster.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The significant altered cortical morphometry regions in EBAs when compared with the NSC group on CT, CV, and SA.

4. Discussion

4.1. Morphological Alteration in the Primary Visual Cortex (V1) and Vision-Related Cortices (Left Rostral Middle Frontal Gyrus, L-r MFC)

Our findings revealed significantly decreased CV and SA and increased CT in the V1 in the EBA group, which are similar to previous studies [12, 13]. These findings demonstrated that the development of V1 is strongly dependent on early visual experience [21, 25, 33, 34]. The following factors may affect the morphological alteration of the V1 during the developmental period. First, axonal degeneration is a key factor causing a reduced SA of the V1 in the early blind [25]. However, our finding of SA loss in the V1 of EBAs cannot completely be explained by axonal degeneration, which may be associated, at least to some degree, with visual loss leading to neurodevelopmental retardation during the developmental stage since no significant negative correlation was found between SA and blindness duration within the EBA group [12, 13]. Second, the increase of CT in the V1of EBAs cannot be explained by disuse atrophy and crossmodal plasticity at the adolescence stage, since there was no significant correlation found between CT and blindness duration within the EBA group. However, the increase of CT in the V1 may be attributed to the loss of normal neurodevelopment, which induces the reduction of synaptic pruning [35]. In addition, a thicker V1 is not found in the subjects who became blind in adulthood, whose V1 CT showed no difference from the sighted controls [33]. According to the microscopic neuroanatomical studies, the synaptic density in the human V1 is largest in the first postnatal year and gradually drops to the adult level during adolescence [36]. The disruption of the normal pruning process in EB, however, might result in a higher synaptic density in the blindnessV1 and spare other sensory connections such as thalamocortical connections and corticocortical connections [2628], which could lead to the increased CT in the visual cortex. Finally, the reduction of GMV in the V1 in early blindness is also consistent with our previous VBM result [37], which reflected axonal degeneration secondary to the impaired visual pathway in the early blindness [3840].

Using this more effective method than VBM, we could further attribute the atrophy of GMV in these areas of the EBA group to the reduced SA despite the increased CT, since CV can be approximated by multiplying CT by SA, so we could infer that the reduction in SA is greater than the increase in CT. According to the study of the cortical development in early childhood, it was reported that CT is developed earlier than SA. At the age of two, CT can reach 97% of adult values, while SA only 69%. The authors concluded that cortical growth after age 1 is mainly induced by increases in SA [41]. The reduction of SA in V1 in the EBAs implied that the loss the light stimulation lagged the SA development after age 1, whereas the loss of light has little impact on the neuron development of CT. In the light of the radial unit hypothesis, SA is defined by the number of cortical columns, while CT is determined by the number of neurons within a column [41]. Although the number of cortical columns declined, the number of neurons in each column increased in V1 in the EBAs that might attribute to the other sensory connections of the crossmodal plasticity. A few literatures have reported that the V1 cortex played an important role in various sensory cognitions (such as auditory and tactile sensation) in blind people, although visual stimulation is lacking [2, 4, 5]. In short, the early-blind patients showed various changes in the CV, CT, and SA in the V1, which reflected the different influence factors like axonal degeneration, disuse atrophy, neurodevelopment, and plasticity that played a diverse effect on these indicators.

The left middle frontal lobe approximately overlaps the frontal eye field, which may be a heterogeneous component of multiple extrastriate visual areas in charge of eye movements like the intentional saccade trigger [42] and smooth pursuit, showing reduced CV in EB. It should also be a subsequent change caused by vision loss.

4.2. Cortical Thickness Alteration in the Visual Cortex (Right Lingual Gyrus, LING.R, and Right Lateral Occipital Gyrus, LOG.R) and Visual-Related Areas outside the Occipital Cortex (SPL.L and STG.L)

In contrast to the previous report of [15, 17] the increased CT in the LING.L in the early-blind subjects, significantly decreased CT was found in the LING.R in this study. As is known, this cortical area related to visual object recognition function forms part of the ventral visual pathway [43, 44]. Kim and Zatorre [45] found that this cortical area of a right hemisphere advantage might be recruited and activated to process auditory spatial position tasks in the blind during identifying auditory objects. In addition, according to the studies by Park et al. and Anurova et al. [12, 17], the negative correlations were found between CT of the occipital cortex and functional activation during auditory localization task in EB. This might account for the decreased thickness of the LING.R in EB who have better crossmodal plasticity abilities to guide action related to auditory localization and spatial discrimination. Meanwhile, the decrease of the CT in the LING.R is consistent with the theory mentioned above, in which the synaptic density is largest in the first postnatal year and gradually drops to the adult level by synaptic pruning during the activation and development.

Moreover, in line with this, many previous studies [15] have shown that increased CT was also located in the higher-level visual association areas (BA 19) such as extrastriate occipital cortex (LOG.R), which plays an important role in the attention, feature extracting, shape recognition, and multimodal integrating functions [4652].

After visual deprivation, the alteration of the cortical thickness not only was found in the occipital cortex but also in the visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex, such as SPL.L and STG.L.

As a part of the dorsal attention network [53], the SPL is involved in spatial cognition [2, 54], sensorimotor, attention, and working memory [5559]. There is a massive experience-related reorganization that blind people participate in the processing of spatial information from auditory [45, 60] and tactile [44] sense instead of visual input. According to a study by Park et al. and Anurova et al. [12, 17], areas with a thinner cortex should be associated with more effective function in EB. Therefore, the thin cortex of SPL may reveal that stronger plasticity of function in EB remaps the additional available sensory inputs (e.g., audition, touch) so that they could handle nonvisual tasks better in the absence of vision.

Our studies found that the increased CT in the left posterior STG (pSTG) is inconsistent with previous reports [12, 17] of the decreased CT in the anterior STG (aSTG). The STG is known to involve in the auditory comprehension process [61, 62]. Moreover, previous studies [63] have suggested that pSTG was more involved in the sound localization, while aSTG was related to auditory pattern processing, which may be explained by anterior-posterior functional dissociation in temporal areas. The increase of pSTG might correspond to the improvement of the ability of the sound localization in EBAs, which might indicate that cortical plasticity following visual deprivation enhances intramodal organization of auditory and tactile perception [64].

In summary, this study explored the structural characteristics of brain gray matter from different perspectives in early EBAs, including CV, SA, and CT. On the one hand, for V1, EBAs had significantly decreased CV and SA but increased CT; axonal degeneration is a key factor leading to a reduced SA of the V1, as well as neurodevelopmental retardation caused by visual loss, while the increase of CT results from the reduction of synaptic pruning due to neurodevelopmental retardation and crossmodal plasticity companying auditory and tactile perception; thus, the decrease of CV might indicate that the reduction of the SA was much more than the increase of the CT. On the other hand, visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex included the decrease of the CV in the left rostral middle frontal gyrus (r-MFC), the increase of the left superior temporal gyrus (STG.L), and the decrease of the CT in the left superior parietal lobule (SPL.L) and the right lingual gyrus (LING.R), which might mainly attribute to intramodal plasticity. Moreover, these cortical alterations were not correlated with the blindness duration. These structural findings might provide the certain basis to interpret the functions of brain regions in the blind. It has proved that the visual-related cortex does not shrink and degenerate and they are involved in various sensory cognitions to different degrees, which ignites a little light to achieve the possibility of crossmodal sensory substitution for blindness.

4.3. Limitation

The major limitation of this study is the limited small sample size, and further studies with larger cohorts are needed to explore different patterns between subgroups. Additionally, the results reveal structural changes, but the relationship between structural changes and functional activation has not been clearly understood and calls for further study for mutual interaction between structure and function.

5. Conclusion

Using the surface-based morphometric (SBM) method and combining different dimensions, such as CT, CV, and SA, to analyze the different morphological alterations of brain after visual deprivation, we investigated the cortical structural reorganization which occurs not only in the occipital cortex but also in the visual-related areas outside the occipital cortex. Our result demonstrated that structural reorganization of different brain regions in EBAs differently was influenced by the major factor(s) (neurodevelopment and/or degeneration and/or plasticity) and their interactions during development.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Key Discipline Construction Project of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine (No. 4901-020000200806), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project (No. JCYJ20190809161011503), the Shenzhen Fund for Guangdong Provincial High-level Clinical Key Specialties (No. SZGSP013).

Contributor Information

Zhifeng Zhou, Email: z_zf1015@163.com.

Xia Liu, Email: lauraliu0061@126.com.

Data Availability

The processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Long Qian provided the guidance for the MRI scan parameter settings. Yang Fan guided us interpret the results of FreeSurfer. Hai Li helped us do picture processing. Gangqiang Hou provided the help for the subject collection. Wentao Jiang facilitated the MRI scan of the subjects. Fen Hou and Hengguo Li contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Abboud S., Maidenbaum S., Dehaene S., Amedi A. A number-form area in the blind. Nature Communications . 2015;6(1):p. 6026. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Collignon O., Dormal G., Albouy G., et al. Impact of blindness onset on the functional organization and the connectivity of the occipital cortex. Brain . 2013;136(9):2769–2783. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kupers R., Chebat D. R., Madsen K. H., Paulson O. B., Ptito M. Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2010;107(28):12716–12721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006199107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kupers R., Ptito M. Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews . 2014;41:36–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Araneda R., Silva Moura S., Dricot L., de Volder A. G. Beat detection recruits the visual cortex in early blind subjects. Life . 2021;11(4):p. 296. doi: 10.3390/life11040296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Noppeney U., Friston K. J., Ashburner J., Frackowiak R., Price C. J. Early visual deprivation induces structural plasticity in gray and white matter. Current Biology . 2005;15(13):R488–R490. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan W. J., Wu G., Li C. X., Lin F., Sun J., Lei H. Progressive atrophy in the optic pathway and visual cortex of early blind Chinese adults: a voxel-based morphometry magnetic resonance imaging study. NeuroImage . 2007;37(1):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ptito M., Schneider F. C., Paulson O. B., Kupers R. Alterations of the visual pathways in congenital blindness. Experimental Brain Research . 2008;187(1):41–49. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1273-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lepore N., Voss P., Lepore F., et al. Brain structure changes visualized in early- and late-onset blind subjects. NeuroImage . 2010;49(1):134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang C., Wu S., Lu W., Bai Y., Gao H. Anatomic differences in early blindness: a deformation-based morphometry MRI study. Journal of Neuroimaging . 2014;24(1):68–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang A., Tian J., Li R., et al. Alterations of regional spontaneous brain activity and gray matter volume in the blind. Neural Plasticity . 2015;2015:12. doi: 10.1155/2015/141950.141950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Park H. J., Lee J. D., Kim E. Y., et al. Morphological alterations in the congenital blind based on the analysis of cortical thickness and surface area. NeuroImage . 2009;47(1):98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jiang J., Zhu W., Shi F., et al. Thick visual cortex in the early blind. The Journal of Neuroscience . 2009;29(7):2205–2211. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5451-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bridge H., Cowey A., Ragge N., Watkins K. Imaging studies in congenital anophthalmia reveal preservation of brain architecture in 'visual' cortex. Brain . 2009;132(12):3467–3480. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Voss P., Zatorre R. J. Occipital cortical thickness predicts performance on pitch and musical tasks in blind individuals. Cerebral Cortex . 2012;22(11):2455–2465. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Qin W., Liu Y., Jiang T., Yu C. The development of visual areas depends differently on visual experience. PLoS One . 2013;8(1, article e53784) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anurova I., Renier L. A., De Volder A. G., Carlson S., Rauschecker J. P. Relationship between cortical thickness and functional activation in the early blind. Cerebral Cortex . 2015;25(8):2035–2048. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guerreiro M. J., Erfort M. V., Henssler J., Putzar L., Roder B. Increased visual cortical thickness in sight-recovery individuals. Human Brain Mapping . 2015;36(12):5265–5274. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mateus C., d'Almeida O. C., Reis A., Silva E., Castelo-Branco M. Genetically induced impairment of retinal ganglion cells at the axonal level is linked to extrastriate cortical plasticity. Brain Structure & Function . 2016;221(3):1767–1780. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou Z., Xu J., Shi L., et al. Alterations of the brain microstructure and corresponding functional connectivity in early-blind adolescents. Neural Plasticity . 2019;2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/2747460.2747460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li J., Liu Y., Qin W., et al. Age of onset of blindness affects brain anatomical networks constructed using diffusion tensor tractography. Cerebral Cortex . 2013;23(3):542–551. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Raznahan A., Shaw P., Lalonde F., et al. How does your cortex grow? Journal of Neuroscience . 2011;31(19):7174–7177. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0054-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shimony J. S., Burton H., Epstein A. A., McLaren D. G., Sun S. W., Snyder A. Z. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter reorganization in early blind humans. Cerebral Cortex . 2006;16(11):1653–1661. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shu N., Li J., Li K., Yu C., Jiang T. Abnormal diffusion of cerebral white matter in early blindness. Human Brain Mapping . 2009;30(1):220–227. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andelin A. K., Olavarria J. F., Fine I., et al. The effect of onset age of visual deprivation on visual cortex surface area across-species. Cerebral Cortex . 2019;29(10):4321–4333. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karlen S. J., Kahn D. M., Krubitzer L. Early blindness results in abnormal corticocortical and thalamocortical connections. Neuroscience . 2006;142(3):843–858. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kingsbury M. A., Lettman N. A., Finlay B. L. Reduction of early thalamic input alters adult corticocortical connectivity. Brain Research. Developmental Brain Research . 2002;138(1):35–43. doi: 10.1016/S0165-3806(02)00456-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sur M., Leamey C. A. Development and plasticity of cortical areas and networks. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience . 2001;2(4):251–262. doi: 10.1038/35067562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhou Z. F., Liu X., Qian L., et al. Grey matter hypertrophy and atrophy in early-blind adolescents: a surface-based morphometric study. ISMRM 28th Annual Meeting & Exhibition; August 2020; Paris, France. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fischl B., Sereno M. I., Dale A. M. Cortical surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface- based coordinate system. NeuroImage . 1999;9(2):195–207. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dale A. M., Fischl B., Sereno M. I. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage . 1999;9(2):179–194. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fischl B., Dale A. M. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2000;97(20):11050–11055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200033797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hooks B. M., Chen C. Critical periods in the visual system: changing views for a model of experience-dependent plasticity. Neuron . 2007;56(2):312–326. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Q., Song M., Xu J., Qin W., Yu C., Jiang T. Cortical thickness development of human primary visual cortex related to the age of blindness onset. Brain Imaging and Behavior . 2017;11(4):1029–1036. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9576-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bourgeois J. P., Jastreboff P. J., Rakic P. Synaptogenesis in visual cortex of normal and preterm monkeys: evidence for intrinsic regulation of synaptic overproduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 1989;86(11):4297–4301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Huttenlocher P. R., de Courten C., Garey L. J., Van der Loos H. Synaptogenesis in human visual cortex — evidence for synapse elimination during normal development. Neuroscience Letters . 1982;33(3):247–252. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90379-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hou F., Liu X., Zhou Z., Zhou J., Li H. Reduction of interhemispheric functional brain connectivity in early blindness: a resting-state fMRI study. BioMed Research International . 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/6756927.6756927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reislev N. L., Dyrby T. B., Siebner H. R., Kupers R., Ptito M. Simultaneous assessment of white matter changes in microstructure and connectedness in the blind brain. Neural Plasticity . 2016;2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/6029241.6029241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aguirre G. K., Datta R., Benson N. C., et al. Patterns of individual variation in visual pathway structure and function in the sighted and blind. PLoS One . 2016;11(11, article e0164677) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reislev N. H., Dyrby T. B., Siebner H. R., Lundell H., Ptito M., Kupers R. Thalamocortical connectivity and microstructural changes in congenital and late blindness. Neural Plasticity . 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/9807512.9807512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Buechler R., Wotruba D., Michels L., et al. Cortical volume differences in subjects at risk for psychosis are driven by surface area. Schizophrenia Bulletin . 2020;46(6):1511–1519. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pierrot-Deseilligny C., Muri R. M., Ploner C. J., Gaymard B., Rivaud-Pechoux S. Cortical control of ocular saccades in humans: a model for motricity. Progress in Brain Research . 2003;142:3–17. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kravitz D. J., Saleem K. S., Baker C. I., Ungerleider L. G., Mishkin M. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences . 2013;17(1):26–49. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ptito M., Matteau I., Zhi Wang A., Paulson O. B., Siebner H. R., Kupers R. Crossmodal recruitment of the ventral visual stream in congenital blindness. Neural Plasticity . 2012;2012:9. doi: 10.1155/2012/304045.304045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim J. K., Zatorre R. J. Tactile-auditory shape learning engages the lateral occipital complex. The Journal of Neuroscience . 2011;31(21):7848–7856. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3399-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rockland K. S., Ojima H. Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. International Journal of Psychophysiology . 2003;50(1-2):19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bonino D., Ricciardi E., Sani L., et al. Tactile spatial working memory activates the dorsal extrastriate cortical pathway in congenitally blind individuals. Archives Italiennes de Biologie . 2008;146(3-4):133–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Collignon O., Davare M., Olivier E., De Volder A. G. Reorganisation of the right occipito-parietal stream for auditory spatial processing in early blind humans. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Topography . 2009;21(3-4):232–240. doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Collignon O., Lassonde M., Lepore F., Bastien D., Veraart C. Functional cerebral reorganization for auditory spatial processing and auditory substitution of vision in early blind subjects. Cerebral Cortex . 2007;17(2):457–465. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lane C., Kanjlia S., Omaki A., Bedny M. "Visual" cortex of congenitally blind adults responds to syntactic movement. The Journal of Neuroscience . 2015;35(37):12859–12868. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1256-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cappagli G., Finocchietti S., Cocchi E., Gori M. The impact of early visual deprivation on spatial hearing: a comparison between totally and partially visually deprived children. Frontiers in Psychology . 2017;8:p. 467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Guggenmos M., Thoma V., Cichy R. M., Haynes J. D., Sterzer P., Richardson-Klavehn A. Non-holistic coding of objects in lateral occipital complex with and without attention. NeuroImage . 2015;107:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang Y., Deng F., Jia Y., et al. Disrupted rich club organization and structural brain connectome in unmedicated bipolar disorder. Psychological Medicine . 2019;49(3):510–518. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Collignon O., Vandewalle G., Voss P., et al. Functional specialization for auditory-spatial processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally blind humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2011;108(11):4435–4440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013928108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Burton H., Sinclair R. J., Dixit S. Working memory for vibrotactile frequencies: comparison of cortical activity in blind and sighted individuals. Human Brain Mapping . 2010;31(11):1686–1701. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bueicheku E., Ventura-Campos N., Palomar-Garcia M. A., Miro-Padilla A., Parcet M. A., Avila C. Functional connectivity between superior parietal lobule and primary visual cortex "at rest" predicts visual search efficiency. Brain Connectivity . 2015;5(8):517–526. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shafritz K. M., Gore J. C., Marois R. The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America . 2002;99(16):10917–10922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152694799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Koenigs M., Barbey A. K., Postle B. R., Grafman J. Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory. The Journal of Neuroscience . 2009;29(47):14980–14986. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wolpert D. M., Goodbody S. J., Husain M. Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nature Neuroscience . 1998;1(6):529–533. doi: 10.1038/2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gori M., Sandini G., Martinoli C., Burr D. C. Impairment of auditory spatial localization in congenitally blind human subjects. Brain . 2014;137(1):288–293. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.DeWitt I., Rauschecker J. P. Convergent evidence for the causal involvement of anterior superior temporal gyrus in auditory single-word comprehension. Cortex . 2016;77:164–166. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wolbers T., Zahorik P., Giudice N. A. Decoding the direction of auditory motion in blind humans. NeuroImage . 2011;56(2):681–687. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen W., Liu B., Zheng J., Li X., Wang P., Wang B. What and where in the auditory systems of sighted and early blind individuals: evidence from representational similarity analysis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences . 2020;413, article 116805 doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.de Borst A. W., de Gelder B. Mental imagery follows similar cortical reorganization as perception: intra-modal and cross-modal plasticity in congenitally blind. Cerebral Cortex . 2019;29(7):2859–2875. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.


Articles from Disease Markers are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES