Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2021 Oct 4;18(10):1259–1264. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01279-0

Fig. 3 |. AO improves in vivo 3P structural and functional imaging in the mouse spinal cord.

Fig. 3 |

a, Schematic of in vivo imaging in the dorsal horn of the mouse spinal cord. b, Maximum intensity projection of spinal cord neurons (Thy1-GFP-M), 208–228 μm below dura, under 1300 nm excitation, without and with AO (phase modulation). Insets: spatial frequency space representations of the corresponding fluorescence images. Post-objective power: 18.3 mW. c, Signal profiles along the purple lines in b. d, Corrective wavefront in b. e, Lateral and axial images of a neuron (Thy1-GFP-M), 414 μm below dura, under 1300 nm excitation, without and with AO (phase modulation). Post-objective power: 89 mW. f, Signal profiles along the blue and yellow lines in e. g, Corrective wavefront in e. h, Schematic for recording calcium activity in jGCaMP7s-expressing neurons of the dorsal horn in the mouse spinal cord (AAV8-Syn-jGCaMP7s), in response to cooling stimuli applied to the skin of the hindlimb. i, Lateral image of a neuron, 310 μm below dura, under 1300 nm excitation, after AO correction. j, (top) 3P fluorescence signal and (middle) calcium transients (ΔF/F0), during (bottom) temperature stimulation, without and with AO (phase modulation), for the neuronal cell body shown in i. 4-trial average; shaded area: s.e.m. Post-objective power: 4.2 mW. k, Corrective wavefront in i. Scale bars, 10 μm. Microscope objective: NA 1.05 25×. Structural imaging: representative results from 7 fields of view and 3 mice; functional imaging: representative results from 3 fields of view, and 2 mice.