Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;126(10):1401–1409. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01711-y

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards analyses of the prognostic and predictive value of BRCA1-like status for RFS and OS.

RFS OS
Variable No. events/no. patients HRa 95% CI P-value No. events/no. patients HRa 95% CI P-value
DNA-based CNV pattern
  BRCA1-like 19/61 1 17/61 1
  Non-BRCA1-like 16/68 1.35 0.69–2.63 0.37 15/68 1.27 0.64–2.56 0.49
Non-BRCA1-like tumours
  T + CEF 15/32 1 14/32 1
  TX + CEX 4/29 0.23b 0.08–0.70 <0.01 3/29 0.19c 0.05–0.66 <0.01
BRCA1-like tumours
  T + CEF 10/37 1 9/37 1
  TX + CEX 6/31 0.66b 0.24–1.81 0.42 6/31 0.75c 0.27–2.11 0.59

RFS recurrence-free survival, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, CNV copy number variation, T + CEF 3 cycles of docetaxel 3-weekly, followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil, 3-weekly, TX + CEX 3 cycles of capecitabine plus docetaxel 3-weekly, followed by 3 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and capecitabine, 3-weekly.

Interaction test between BRCA1-like status and chemotherapy regimen:

aAll Cox proportional hazard analyses shown here were unadjusted for clinicopathologic variables. Similar results were obtained when adjusted for one covariate at the time (due to the relatively small number of events).

bP = 0.17;

cP = 0.09.