Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;8(69):39256–39268. doi: 10.1039/c8ra08471h

Comparison of degradation of 2,4-D herbicide using other methodsa.

Methods Electrode type pH C 0 (mg L−1) Time (min) j Degradation (%) COD (%) Ref.
Electrochemical process SS316 7 100 50 3 mA cm−2 17.65 * 7
Electrochemical process Graphite 7 100 50 3 mA cm−2 47.76 * 7
Electrochemical process Pb/PbO2 6 100 120 60 mA cm−2 57 56 2
Coupling electrooxidation and oxone PbO2 4 40 90 30 mA cm−2 91 * 1
Photo assisted electro-peroxone Platinum sheet 7 25 30 350 mA 89 * 3
Microwave activated electrochemical BDD * 100 180 55 mA 91 88 4
Coupled Fenton and biological oxidation * 3 180 480 * 80 85–90 5
Oxidation process * 3 200 120 * 68 * 6
Electrochemical coagulation process iron 7 50 180 100 mA cm−2 91 * 8
Electrodegradation** G/β-PbO2 5 100 100 9 mA cm−2 87.6 92.1 This study
Electrodegradation*** G/β-PbO2 5 100 100 9 mA cm−2 70.2 75.3 This study
a

*Not considered, ** three-dimensional electrode and *** two-dimensional electrode.