Skip to main content
. 1998 Dec;64(12):4789–4795. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.12.4789-4795.1998

TABLE 2.

Mean retention rates of bacteria on three types of 5-μm-pore filtersa

Strain LSWP filters
SVLP filters
TMTP filters
No. of cells filteredb % Retained (mean ± SD)c No. of cells filtered % Retained (mean ± SD) No. of cells filtered % Retained (mean ± SD)
Pseudomonas fluorescens PF130A 9.57 × 107 0.03 ± 0.01 9.03 × 107 0.31 ± 0.03 9.65 × 107 <0.001d
Pseudomonas putida MC1-100 1.37 × 108 1.91 ± 0.15 1.33 × 108 1.32 ± 0.24 1.40 × 108 0.004 ± 0.003
Corynebacterium aquaticum MC1-098 1.01 × 108 0.04 ± 0.01 9.50 × 107 2.29 ± 0.13 9.75 × 107 0.004 ± 0.002
Corynebacterium aquaticum MC1-108 8.17 × 107 0.04 ± 0.01 8.03 × 107 0.34 ± 0.03 7.95 × 107 <0.001d
Hafnia alvei MC1-057 6.17 × 107 0.52 ± 0.03 6.60 × 107 0.54 ± 0.00 5.55 × 107 <0.002d
a

The filters are described in Table 1. Retention rates were determined for bacterial suspensions prefiltered across SVLP filters. 

b

Values represent the mean number of bacteria in three 50-ml aliquots of suspensions passed across each type of filter. Each suspension had been prefiltered across polyvinylidene fluoride filters (5-μm-diameter pores) before the population sizes were determined. 

c

Values represent the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the percentage of bacteria retained on the filters for three independent filtrations. 

d

The number of bacteria on the filters was below the detection limit (1,000 CFU/filter) for all filters in this test. Hence, the percent retention rate was estimated by using the detection limit.