Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Food Prot. 2021 Dec 1;84(12):2195–2212. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-219

Table 5.

Summary of current practices for mitigation of ethyl carbamate in food and beverages.

Mitigation method Comments References
Input ingredients • Grapes with excessive nitrogen levels can contribute to ethyl carbamate formation. Butzke & Bisson (1997)
Genetically engineered yeast • Yeast with enhanced capability to reduce urea has been commercialized.
• Bread and red wine made with this modified yeast are reported to have reduced ethyl carbamate formation.
Heller et al. (2006)
Removal of stone fruit pits • Reduction in the number of stone fruit pits in the fermentation mash can reduce ethyl carbamate formation. Codex Committee (2009)
Distillation • Efficient separation of the “heads” and “tails” fractions from the “hearts” fraction during distillation reduces ethyl carbamate levels in the distillate. Codex Committee (2009)
Distillation apparatus (a still) • A still with copper boiling kettle can reduce levels of cyanate.
• Use of a stainless-steel collection vessel compared to a copper vessel can prevent ethyl carbamate formation post-distillation.
Codex Committee (2009)
Enzymatic Treatment (urease) • Treatment reduces levels of the ethyl carbamate precursor urea.
• Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the FDA.
• Permitted for use in wine by the International Association of Vine and Wine (OIV).
FDA (1993); OIV (2017)
Storage conditions • The finished product should be stored in tinted bottles and away from excessive heat. Codex Committee (2009)